A Vancouver consultant is accused of defrauding “dozens of people” with a false immigration scheme. While having her license suspended and facing a class action lawsuit from former clients, Liza Lucion denies any misconduct.
Numerous immigrants allegedly fell victim to fraud committed by a Vancouver woman who promised them a way to obtain permanent residency in Canada through a nonexistent immigration program.
Due to multiple complaints from previous clients who say they were defrauded, Liza Lucion’s registration as a certified immigration consultant was suspended this summer. Additionally, a proposed class action lawsuit against her is being considered.
However, Liza Lucion refutes every accusation of wrongdoing.
The immigration program fraud
Lucion and her business, Canadian Global Immigration Consulting Services, charged “exorbitant fees” and advertised services to file immigration applications through a program that did not exist. Andres Barrios Medellin, a representative plaintiff, explained these claims in an amended notice of claim filed in October in the B.C. Supreme Court.
According to the claims, “dozens of victims paid Lucion business fees of around $5,000 or more” for a COVID-related program. She allegedly promised this program would provide them with two-year open work permits to bring their families to Canada and provide a path to permanent residency. In addition, Lucion allegedly misrepresented herself by claiming to be a lawyer.
After finding these victims were in Canada without legal status or with expired status and had no legitimate application in progress to seek, renew, or extend their status, the claim continued; they were in extreme emotional suffering.
Mexican native Barrios told CBC that after learning he wouldn’t get the expected work permit, he felt “confused, frustrated, and desperate.”
It’s about wasting time, says Barrios, time that could have been spent with aging parents at home or going through legal immigration routes. “I’m always in touch with people that hired Liza,” he said.
- You may also like:
- ‘Ghost’ Immigration Consultants On The Rise Across Canada
- Beware Of These Most Common Scams Targeting People In Canada
- Understanding A Valid Job Offer For Canada Express Entry!
- How To Avoid Immigration Fraud!
Lucion’s response to the case allegations
The lawsuit also names Jose Guadalupe Garcia Hernandez, Lucion’s husband, and the contracting business he runs as defendants.
In their replies to the proposed class action, the couple refutes every charge of fraud, negligence, or conspiracy.
Ms. Lucion denies that she exploited any workers, according to an email from Melanie Samuels, her attorney, to CBC.
Lucion’s attorney, Melanie Samuels, explains this group of complainants is unfairly defaming her because there is no proof of the claimed fraud. Most likely, they misinterpreted what she said to them and were encouraged by others to start this vicious attack on her brand and character.
Samuels claimed that despite Lucion’s “best efforts” to assist him, Barrios broke the terms of his retainer agreement with her by not cooperating with the immigration procedure.
According to Lucion’s response to the allegation, she always “operated honestly and in good faith,” depending on legitimate immigration processes and COVID-19 pandemic-related laws. However, further allegations state that she frequently paid for her clients’ immigration statuses out of her own money.
Additionally, Lucion denies telling her clients that she is a lawyer. However, the Law Society of British Columbia has certified that she has agreed to an undertaking to abide by the Legal Professions Act with respect to those claims.
In response to the allegation, her husband Garcia denied involvement in advising on or promoting immigration programs. Although he occasionally translated documents into Spanish for his wife, the document claims that he only facilitated communications between parties and was not himself a party to the discussions.
Clients who complained allegedly received threats from Lucion
The College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants issued an interim order in July suspending Lucion’s right to practice as an immigration consultant and ordering her to pay $10,000 in fees.
Susan Heakes, the head of the college’s discipline committee, reported that the college looked into 11 complaints that former clients had made in the last 25 months. If the accusations against Lucion are confirmed, according to Heakes, her license will probably be cancelled or, at the very least, suspended for a “lengthy” period.
According to Heakes, this alleged misconduct would be among the most serious violations that an immigration consultant might commit as it has severe repercussions for the victims and negatively reflects the profession.
The complaints in her ruling are similar to those in Barrios’ statement of claim.
According to the two documents, Lucion allegedly held group information sessions where she asserted that foreign nationals in Canada might contact her to apply to a brand-new government program. If the clients used her services, she allegedly promised open work permits.
Heakes’ ruling states that when this did not occur, and some of these former clients complained to Ms. Lucion and requested repayment of their money, Ms. Lucion allegedly threatened them and filed baseless civil cases against them.
The decision claims that among the alleged threats was informing a former customer that she would either accuse them of tax evasion or have them deported.
However, there is no evidence to support the claims made in the college’s decision or the court documents in the proposed class action lawsuit.
Source: CBC News
- New OAS Payments Coming On September 25, 2026
The next Old Age Security deposit – OAS payment is confirmed for Friday, September 25, when Service Canada will issue OAS pensions, Guaranteed Income Supplement top-ups, Allowance payments, and Allowance for the Survivor payments on the same nationwide payment date.
This is the third and final deposit at the July-to-September 2026 quarterly rates, which delivered the largest quarterly increase of 2026 up to that point.
The 1.2% adjustment was calculated from the change in the average CPI for February, March, and April 2026 compared with the applicable earlier three-month period.
A single senior with no other income who also qualifies for the full Guaranteed Income Supplement can receive a combined monthly deposit of $1,875.14 in the 65-to-74 age group or $1,950.34 at age 75 and over.
If your circumstances and entitlement have not changed, your September 25 payment should generally match your August 27 payment because both use the same quarterly rates.
Individual amounts can still change because of factors such as turning 75, updated income or residence information, or OAS recovery-tax adjustments.
Table of Contents
Current OAS And GIS Payment Amounts for September 2026
The following maximum monthly amounts apply to the September 25 deposit and reflect the July-to-September 2026 quarterly rates.
Not everyone receives the maximum OAS pension because the amount is prorated based on how many years you lived in Canada after turning 18, with 40 years of residence required for the full amount.
GIS amounts decrease as income rises, so the maximums listed below go to those with the least other income.
- OAS pension (age 65 to 74): $751.97 per month maximum.
- OAS pension (age 75 and older): $827.17 per month maximum.
- GIS (single, widowed, or divorced senior): $1,123.17 per month maximum, with annual income under $22,800.
- GIS (spouse or common-law partner also receives full OAS): $676.09 per month maximum each, with combined annual income under $30,096.
- Allowance (age 60 to 64, spouse of GIS recipient): $1,428.06 per month maximum.
- Allowance for the Survivor (age 60 to 64, surviving spouse): $1,702.34 per month maximum.
- Combined OAS and GIS (single senior, age 65 to 74, no other income): $1,875.14 per month.
- Combined OAS and GIS (single senior, age 75 and older, no other income): $1,950.34 per month.
The Allowance and Allowance for the Survivor serve as bridge programs for lower-income Canadians aged 60 to 64 who are connected to the OAS system through a current or former spouse.
Both programs end when the recipient turns 65 and becomes eligible for OAS and GIS directly.
Confirmed 1.4% OAS Increase Coming In October
The Government of Canada has confirmed a 1.4% quarterly increase for the October-to-December 2026 quarter, the strongest single-quarter adjustment of the entire calendar year.
Based on the confirmed 1.4% rate applied to the current July-to-September maximums, the projected October-to-December amounts are as follows.
- OAS pension (age 65 to 74): approximately $762.50 per month.
- OAS pension (age 75 and older): approximately $838.75 per month.
- GIS (single, widowed, or divorced senior): approximately $1,138.89 per month.
- GIS (spouse or common-law partner also receives full OAS): approximately $685.56 per month each.
- Combined OAS and GIS (single senior, age 65 to 74, no other income): approximately $1,901.39 per month.
- Combined OAS and GIS (single senior, age 75 and older, no other income): approximately $1,977.64 per month.
These projected figures are calculated by applying the confirmed 1.4% increase to current rates and may differ slightly from the final rounded amounts Service Canada publishes on the official quarterly rate card.
The new rates will first appear in the October 28 deposit and hold steady through the November 26 and December 22 payments.
Who Qualifies For OAS And GIS
OAS eligibility depends on age, legal status, and residence history.
If you live in Canada, you generally need at least 10 years of Canadian residence after age 18 for a partial pension, while 40 years produces a full pension.
If you live outside Canada, the normal requirement is 20 years of Canadian residence after age 18, although an international social security agreement may help you qualify with fewer years.
Old Age Security is funded entirely from general federal tax revenue rather than from payroll contributions, which distinguishes it from contribution-based pension programs.
Newcomers who arrived later in life often receive partial pensions, though social security agreements with more than 60 countries may allow foreign residence periods to count toward the minimum eligibility threshold.
To qualify for the Guaranteed Income Supplement, you must live in Canada, receive OAS, be at least 65, meet the applicable income threshold for your marital situation, and generally not be under an active sponsorship agreement.
GIS is generally reduced as other income rises, broadly at 50 cents for each dollar of other income, although special rules apply.
In particular, the first $5,000 of employment or self-employment earnings is fully exempt, while only half of earnings between $5,000 and $15,000 counts toward the GIS calculation.
Filing your income tax return on time is essential because Service Canada uses your previous year’s return to determine GIS eligibility and calculate your payment amount each July.
Filing taxes late can cause GIS payments to be reduced or interrupted.
The Annual GIS Income Reset In July
July is the most consequential month in the OAS calendar because Service Canada recalculates every GIS, Allowance, and Allowance for the Survivor amount based on the recipient’s previous year’s tax return.
For the current July 2026 to June 2027 benefit year, GIS is calculated using your 2025 net income as reported on your 2025 tax return.
This means the July payment carries two separate adjustments: the quarterly CPI increase that applies to all OAS benefits and an individual GIS recalculation based on whether your 2025 income was higher or lower than your 2024 income.
Some recipients saw their GIS amount change noticeably in July for this reason, and the recalculated amount has carried through August and September.
If your 2025 income was lower than your 2024 income, your GIS may have increased beyond the quarterly CPI adjustment alone.
Conversely, if your 2025 income was higher, your GIS may have decreased despite the quarterly inflation increase.
The next annual reset will arrive in July 2027, using your 2026 tax return.
The OAS Recovery Tax
Higher-income seniors face the OAS recovery tax, commonly known as the clawback, which reduces their pension by 15 cents for every dollar of net world income above the annual threshold.
For the current July 2026 to June 2027 recovery period, the threshold is $93,454 in 2025 net world income for all OAS recipients according to the OAS clawback rules for 2026.
Full OAS repayment occurs at $152,062 of net world income for seniors aged 65 to 74 and at $157,923 for seniors aged 75 and older.
The higher upper threshold for older seniors reflects the larger base pension they receive through the permanent 10% enhancement.
For Canadian residents, the OAS recovery-tax calculation is based on net income before adjustments on the tax return, subject to specific CRA adjustments.
OAS pension income is included in that calculation.
For the 2026 income year, a separate and higher threshold of $95,323 will govern OAS payments from July 2027 through June 2028.
The recovery tax is spread across 12 monthly OAS payments rather than collected as a single lump sum at tax time.
Tax-Free Savings Account withdrawals are not included in income for OAS recovery-tax purposes, which means they do not affect the clawback calculation.
How To Apply For OAS And GIS
Most people do not need to apply for OAS if Service Canada has enough information to enrol them automatically.
If Service Canada does not enroll you automatically, you will receive a notification letter around your 64th birthday confirming your eligibility.
If you need to apply online, you can do so through your My Service Canada Account once you are at least one month past your 64th birthday.
The combined OAS and GIS paper application is ISP-3550, while people already receiving OAS who need to apply only for GIS use the form ISP-3025.
You can also visit a Service Canada centre for in-person assistance.
Once enrolled, GIS renews automatically each year as long as you file your income tax return on time by April 30.
If your return is late and GIS payments are interrupted, payments can resume once Service Canada receives the required income information and confirms your eligibility, and any past amounts owed may then be paid.
The Allowance and Allowance for the Survivor require separate applications because eligibility depends on the applicant’s age, marital status, and connection to a GIS recipient or deceased spouse.
OAS And GIS Payment Dates 2026-2027
The confirmed remaining 2026 dates and projected 2027 dates through June are listed below. The 2026 dates are confirmed on the federal benefits payment calendar.
The 2027 dates are projected based on the third-from-last banking day of each month, which is the pattern Service Canada has historically followed, and will be confirmed when the official 2027 calendar is published.
Confirmed 2026 Dates:
- Friday, September 25, 2026 (final payment at July-to-September rates)
- Wednesday, October 28, 2026 (first payment at new October-to-December rates, 1.4% increase)
- Thursday, November 26, 2026 (second payment at October-to-December rates)
- Tuesday, December 22, 2026 (third payment at October-to-December rates)
Projected 2027 Dates:
- Wednesday, January 27, 2027 (first payment at new January-to-March 2027 rates)
- Wednesday, February 24, 2027
- Monday, March 29, 2027
- Wednesday, April 28, 2027 (first payment at new April-to-June 2027 rates)
- Thursday, May 27, 2027
- Monday, June 28, 2027 (final payment before July 2027 annual GIS reset)
The October 28 deposit is the next date to watch because it will carry the confirmed 1.4% quarterly increase into recipients’ bank accounts.
January 2027 will bring another quarterly adjustment, either an increase or a hold at October-to-December levels if CPI is flat or declines.
The June 2027 payment is significant because it will be the final deposit before Service Canada recalculates GIS using 2026 tax returns in July 2027.
What To Do If Your Payment Does Not Arrive
Direct-deposit payments are scheduled for September 25, although bank posting times can vary.
Cheque recipients should expect longer delivery times because Service Canada mails cheques during the last three business days of the month.
If your September 25 deposit has not arrived, wait at least 5 to 10 business days before contacting Service Canada.
You can reach Service Canada at 1-800-277-9914 to report a missing payment or start a payment inquiry.
Before calling, confirm that your direct deposit banking information and mailing address are all current through your My Service Canada Account.
For GIS recipients specifically, a missing or reduced payment often traces back to an unfiled or late-processed income tax return rather than a banking issue.
The September 25 OAS and GIS deposit brings the July-to-September 2026 quarter to a close at rates that delivered the year’s largest quarterly increase up to that point, before the confirmed 1.4% October adjustment pushes payments higher still.
Federal figures show about 7.7 million OAS clients in 2025-26, while the latest full-year data show 2.5 million low-income OAS pensioners received GIS in 2024-25.
For millions of recipient households, these quarterly adjustments translate into real changes in monthly budgets.
Confirm your deposit on September 25, review your account through My Service Canada Account, and ensure your 2025 tax return has been assessed so your GIS entitlement remains uninterrupted through the rest of the benefit year.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
When is the next OAS increase after September 25, 2026?
The next OAS increase takes effect with the October 28, 2026, deposit. The Government of Canada has confirmed a 1.4% quarterly increase for the October-to-December 2026 quarter, the largest single-quarter adjustment of the entire year. The projected maximum OAS pension for that quarter is approximately $762.50 for seniors aged 65 to 74 and approximately $838.75 for those 75 and older. GIS, Allowance, and Allowance for the Survivor rates will also rise by 1.4% in the same quarter. The following adjustment will arrive in January 2027 with the exact rate depending on CPI data from the preceding months.
Will my GIS amount change between now and the next July reset?
Your individual GIS amount typically holds steady between July and the following June because it is based on the previous year’s tax return, which does not change within the benefit year. However, the dollar amount in your monthly deposit can still shift quarterly because GIS rates are adjusted alongside OAS based on CPI. If Service Canada identifies an error in your income assessment or receives amended tax information from the CRA, your individual GIS could also change mid-year. The next full annual GIS recalculation will arrive with the July 2027 payment using your 2026 tax return.
Can I receive OAS if I no longer live in Canada?
If you lived in Canada for at least 20 years after turning 18, your OAS pension continues indefinitely regardless of where you live. If you have fewer than 20 years of Canadian residence, you may still qualify to receive OAS abroad if Canada’s social security agreement with another country allows qualifying periods in both countries to be combined to meet the 20-year requirement. The amount of your Canadian OAS pension, however, remains based on your actual years of Canadian residence after age 18. GIS is generally not payable outside Canada beyond six months because it requires Canadian residency as an ongoing eligibility condition.
How does the OAS recovery tax work and who does it affect?
The OAS recovery tax reduces your pension by 15% of net world income above the annual threshold. For the July 2026 to June 2027 recovery period, the threshold is $93,454 in 2025 net world income. Seniors whose income exceeded that level will see a monthly deduction spread across 12 OAS payments. Full OAS repayment occurs at $152,062 for seniors aged 65 to 74 and $157,923 for those 75 and older. Net income includes OAS pension income, while TFSA withdrawals are not included in income for OAS recovery-tax purposes. The recovery tax applies to higher-income OAS recipients whose calculated income exceeds the applicable threshold.
What is the difference between the OAS pension and the Guaranteed Income Supplement?
OAS is a taxable monthly pension available to eligible people aged 65 and older, with eligibility primarily based on legal status and years of Canadian residence after age 18. GIS is a non-taxable monthly top-up paid only to OAS recipients who live in Canada and whose annual income falls below specific thresholds based on marital status. The maximum GIS for a single senior in the July-to-September 2026 quarter is $1,123.17 per month, compared to the maximum OAS pension of $751.97 for seniors aged 65 to 74. Together, a single senior with no other income can receive up to $1,875.14 per month. While GIS is non-taxable, it must still be reported on line 14600 of the tax return with an offsetting deduction on line 25000. Both OAS and GIS adjust quarterly based on CPI.
Fact-Checked: All OAS and GIS payment amounts, quarterly indexation rates, recovery tax thresholds, GIS employment income exemptions, tax reporting requirements, and confirmed 2026 deposit dates in this article were verified against the official Government of Canada OAS payment amounts page. Projected 2027 payment dates are based on the third-from-last banking day of each month and will be confirmed when the official 2027 calendar is published.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and does not constitute financial, legal, or tax advice. Contact Service Canada at 1-800-277-9914 or a qualified professional for guidance on your specific OAS and GIS situation.
Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.
You may also like: New OAS Payments Coming On September 25, 2026
New Minimum Wage In Canada’s 5 Provinces Effective October 1
New OAS Payment Increase Coming In October 2026
New Canada Benefit Payments Still Coming In September 2026
- Canada Developing A New Express Entry Application System
Canada is building new digital infrastructure for Express Entry, and IRCC has now named the program as an early modernization priority.
IRCC says the first release of its new case management platform will deliver a new Expression of Interest system for Express Entry.
Express Entry candidates are also the next group targeted for IRCC’s consolidated online account, which already serves visitor and passport clients.
IRCC has not announced an exact launch date, and it has not confirmed a launch month or quarter either.
Its September 2026 transition documents place the rollout among Digital Platform Modernization milestones for “the coming year,” extending the implementation window into 2027.
Immigration News Canada expects the new system is most likely to arrive in mid-to-late 2027, potentially around fall 2027, although IRCC has not announced a specific month or deadline.
This is a technology story rather than a selection overhaul, and nothing in the documents changes CRS scores, draw rules or eligibility.
Table of Contents
When Will The New Express Entry System Launch?
IRCC has not published a launch day, a launch month or a fixed quarter for the new Express Entry system.
The clearest timing signal comes from the IRCC Deputy Minister Transition Binder page on Digital Platform Modernization, last updated September 4, 2026.
Under its upcoming milestones, IRCC says it will work toward the first release of its case management platform in the coming year.
That same milestone list names the rollout of a new Expression of Interest system to manage Express Entry applications as a specific focus.
Read literally from a September 2026 update, “the coming year” covers the period running from late 2026 broadly into 2027.
Immigration News Canada’s current expectation is that the rollout arrives around fall 2027, although IRCC itself has not committed to that timeframe.
That expectation is our reading of IRCC’s wording, not an official deadline, and schedules for large government systems frequently shift.
What Exactly Is IRCC Building?
IRCC is building two connected systems, one that applicants will see and another that officers will use behind the scenes.
The Front End: A Single IRCC Online Account
On the client side, IRCC is building a client experience platform meant to become one online window for all its services.
The first piece is a new online account that launched in June 2024 for eligible visitor visa clients.
IRCC says more than 123,000 clients had used that account to apply for a visitor visa as of January 31, 2026.
The account expanded in December 2024 to some adult passport clients in Canada, making online passport renewals possible for the first time.
IRCC’s transition binder states plainly that Express Entry clients are the next group targeted for this new online account.
It also says the department’s existing legacy client portals will eventually be consolidated into the same single solution.
The Back End: A New Case Management Platform
Behind the scenes, IRCC is replacing the Global Case Management System, which the department says has been in use for more than 20 years.
IRCC describes GCMS as complex and fragile and says it cannot meet the business demands of today’s immigration system.
Officers currently rely on GCMS, IRCC’s processing system and system of record, to process immigration applications.
The replacement Case Management Platform is being built in releases, and Express Entry’s Expression of Interest system is the first release target.
IRCC says the full platform will include case management, enterprise data, business rules management, advanced analytics, reporting and inventory tools.
IRCC also says the new platform will support greater automation of clear-cut cases and integrated AI to help decision-makers work more efficiently.
That wording describes tools that assist officers, and IRCC has not said AI will make final immigration decisions on its own.
Questions about automated tools are not new, given earlier scrutiny of Chinook, an internal tool IRCC says does not make decisions.
Why A “New Expression Of Interest System” Is Not A New Program
The phrase “new Expression of Interest system” can easily be misread as a brand-new selection model for Express Entry candidates.
Express Entry has worked on an Expression of Interest model since 2015, long before this modernization program was formally launched in 2022.
Candidates submit an online profile, which is itself an expression of interest in immigrating through an eligible federal economic program.
IRCC checks that profile against program criteria, places eligible candidates in the pool and ranks them using the Comprehensive Ranking System.
Top-ranked candidates can receive Invitations to Apply through general, program-specific, or category-based rounds.
What IRCC is now building is the software environment that will receive, store and manage those profiles and applications.
In plain terms, the documents describe rebuilding the system that runs Express Entry, not redesigning how Express Entry selects immigrants.
Current Express Entry System vs. New Digital System
The table below separates how Express Entry works today from the digital components IRCC says it is developing.
Stage Current Express Entry system New digital environment in development Online account Candidates use the existing IRCC secure account, alongside several legacy portals. One consolidated IRCC online account, with Express Entry clients targeted next Profile submission Candidates submit an Express Entry profile through the current system. New Expression of Interest functionality built on the modern platform Eligibility and ranking Profiles are assessed for eligible programs, and eligible candidates are ranked under the CRS. No announced change to eligibility criteria or CRS scoring Invitations IRCC issues Invitations to Apply through general, program-specific, and category-based rounds. No announced change to draw rules or invitation volumes Processing Officers work in GCMS and related legacy tools New Case Management Platform with business rules, data, reporting and inventory tools These components are not scheduled to arrive together, because IRCC describes the program as a phased rollout delivered in separate tranches.
Will Express Entry Profiles Or CRS Rules Change?
Nothing in the Digital Platform Modernization material establishes a change to CRS scoring, program eligibility or ranking mechanics for candidates.
It also does not change category-based draws, invitation cutoffs, the number of invitations issued or Canada’s permanent resident admission targets.
Those policy levers are set through regulations, ministerial instructions and levels planning, not through an internal technology modernization project.
The Express Entry policy can still change separately, and several separate proposals are already being discussed for 2027 and beyond.
IRCC’s consultation on 2027 Express Entry categories raised the possibility of narrowing the number or eligibility of categories aimed at addressing long-term labour shortages.
A private-sector report from RBC has also proposed major Express Entry draw changes, although those remain recommendations rather than government policy.
Readers should keep those policy discussions separate from this technology story, because the transition binder does not connect them in any way.
Candidates watching score movement can keep following CRS score distribution data without expecting this project to shift scores directly.
Recent rounds such as the September 4 healthcare draw continue to operate under current rules, with no system-related changes announced.
What Express Entry Applicants Should Do Now
IRCC has not asked Express Entry candidates to take any action because of the future Expression of Interest system.
Applicants should keep using the currently authorized IRCC secure account and the existing Express Entry system unless IRCC issues transition instructions.
Candidates in the pool should keep their profiles accurate, report changes promptly and follow normal IRCC instructions for their stage.
Invited candidates should still manage the 60-day application window through their current account, exactly as IRCC directs today.
There is no instruction to recreate a profile, open a new account or move documents into a different portal.
Candidates using GCKey or a Sign-In Partner should keep their credentials secure and up-to-date.
Migration steps, transition dates and the treatment of existing profiles and applications remain among the details IRCC has not announced.
Official instructions will come from IRCC directly, so applicants should be cautious about unofficial claims describing a new application process.
What IRCC Still Hasn’t Revealed
Several practical questions remain unanswered, and IRCC has not published public guidance on any of the following points.
- The exact launch date and launch month or quarter for the new Express Entry system.
- Whether the rollout will happen all at once or in phases for different user groups.
- How existing Express Entry profiles will be migrated into the new environment.
- Whether current accounts and sign-in credentials will transfer automatically to the new online account.
- Whether applicants will need to take any action during the transition.
- When the current Express Entry interfaces will be retired.
- Whether every Express Entry program will move to the new system at the same time.
- How authorized representatives will transition their clients and account access.
- Whether the old and new systems will operate side by side for a temporary period.
Until IRCC answers these questions publicly, specific claims about migration steps or cutover dates should be treated as speculation.
Why IRCC Is Replacing Its Immigration Technology
IRCC says its aging digital platforms limit how quickly the department can respond to changing priorities and unexpected events.
That pressure is visible in processing volumes, with more than 1.5 million immigration and citizenship applications not yet finalized as of May 31, 2026.
IRCC says the new platforms are meant to increase technical stability and reduce outages, which matters for a high-volume system like Express Entry.
Quicker implementation of policy changes is another stated goal, which is relevant as Express Entry category priorities keep evolving each year.
Better and more accessible data is also expected to strengthen risk management and program integrity through a new Enterprise Data Platform.
IRCC says Chinook was developed in part to reduce processing delays caused by system and broadband latency when officers work with information stored in GCMS.
IRCC has already expanded automation elsewhere, including spousal sponsorship eligibility tools and visitor visa triage for routine files.
It has also piloted data-driven tools such as GeoMatch for Express Entry candidates, showing how analytics is entering the program.
Stronger inventory-management tools could also help IRCC manage large application inventories more efficiently.
For Express Entry, the benefit IRCC describes is a single account for clients and a modern case system for its officers.
Based on the evidence currently available, Canada is not replacing the Express Entry immigration model or its ranking system.
IRCC is building the digital infrastructure that will support how candidates submit profiles and applications and how officers process those files.
The most important unanswered question is timing, because IRCC has not published a specific public launch date for the new system.
Its September 2026 documentation places the rollout within a coming-year window extending into 2027, with fall 2027 our current expectation.
Until IRCC issues formal transition instructions, candidates should keep using the current system and follow Express Entry draw activity as usual.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Will I need to create a new IRCC account for Express Entry once the new system launches?
IRCC’s transition documents say legacy client portals will eventually be consolidated into the new online account, and Express Entry clients are the next group targeted. However, no instructions have been published on account creation, credential transfer or profile migration. Until IRCC issues formal guidance, candidates should keep using their current IRCC secure account. They should not open duplicate accounts or recreate profiles.
Could artificial intelligence refuse my Express Entry application under the new platform?
IRCC describes integrated AI as a tool to help decision-makers work more efficiently, not as an independent decision-maker. The department has not said AI will make final immigration decisions on its own. It has long maintained that officers make final approval or refusal decisions, including when automated triage tools are used.
Will provincial nominee programs be affected by the new Express Entry system?
The procurement records include Provincial Nominee Program (PNP) applications submitted through Express Entry in the new client platform’s scope. The Release 1 contract also lists a provincial and territorial nomination portal among its components. IRCC has not announced how this will change the steps for provinces or nominees. Provincial EOI systems run by the provinces themselves are separate, and nothing in the federal documents announces changes to them.
Fact-Checked: All Digital Platform Modernization details in this article were verified against the official IRCC Deputy Minister Transition Binder 2026: Digital Platform Modernization as published on Canada.ca with a page date of September 4, 2026.
Disclaimer: This article is for general information only, so review IRCC’s official Express Entry program page or consult a licensed immigration professional before acting.
Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.
You may also like: New OAS Payments Coming On September 25, 2026
New Minimum Wage In Canada’s 5 Provinces Effective October 1
New OAS Payment Increase Coming In October 2026
New Canada Benefit Payments Still Coming In September 2026
- Canada Visitor Visa Screening Tightens With 40+ Criteria Now In Play
Canada’s screening of visitor visa applicants has become more rigorous as Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada discloses new details about the layered framework governing who may travel to the country.
IRCC says Canada’s Visa Policy Framework relies on more than 40 criteria when evaluating whether to impose, lift, or partially lift a visa requirement for citizens of a specific country.
These criteria operate at the national visa-policy level and are distinct from the individual assessment that each visitor visa applicant undergoes when applying for a temporary resident visa.
The disclosure appears in IRCC’s 2026 Deputy Minister transition binder, published on the official government website with a page date of September 4, 2026.
It arrives as IRCC projects visitor application volumes of approximately 5.8 million in 2026, up from almost 5.6 million in 2025.
IRCC confirms that actions taken under its visitor-integrity strategy have reduced fraud and tightened visa screening.
Table of Contents
Canada Visitor Visa Screening Is Now Tighter
IRCC states that an integrity strategy launched in summer 2024 was designed to address growing misuse and irregular migration by temporary resident visa holders.
Actions undertaken since that strategy began have reduced fraud and tightened visa screening, according to the department.
IRCC says the tightening has focused on top visitor populations where abuse of the system was identified.
The department does not name specific nationalities in that context but frames the effort as targeted rather than universal.
IRCC separately notes that the number of asylum claims originating from visitors has risen significantly in recent years.
Those claims increase processing costs, contribute to backlogs at the Immigration and Refugee Board, and affect the overall sustainability of Canada’s in-country asylum system.
The department says it seeks to facilitate travel for genuine visitors who contribute to the Canadian economy without compromising public safety or immigration program integrity.
What Are Canada’s 40+ Visitor Visa Criteria?
Canada’s Visa Policy Framework has guided decisions for more than 20 years regarding which foreign nationals may travel to Canada without a visa.
IRCC says more than 40 criteria are used to assess the risks and benefits of lifting or imposing a visa requirement on a country’s citizens.
The department identifies several examples of these criteria. Safety and security concerns are among them.
Passport integrity and identity management are the other. Bilateral benefits, such as trade and tourism facilitation, are also weighed.
Migration trends form a further category, and IRCC specifically mentions asylum claims and immigration violations, including unauthorized work and unauthorized study.
The framework assesses both the risks of granting visa-free access and the benefits of facilitating travel from a given country.
IRCC says Canada has the unique ability to fully or partially lift a visa requirement on a country’s citizens.
The transition binder does not enumerate all of the more than 40 criteria.
It identifies examples including safety and security concerns, passport integrity and identity management, bilateral benefits, and migration trends.
The 40+ Criteria Are Not A Checklist For Individual Applicants
The distinction between the Visa Policy Framework and individual application screening is essential. The more-than-40 criteria apply at the country visa-policy level.
They inform whether citizens of a particular country are subject to a visa requirement or can benefit from visa-exempt travel, which generally requires an eTA when travelling to Canada by air.
Individual temporary resident visa applications undergo their own separate assessment focused on the applicant’s personal circumstances and admissibility.
To illustrate, Canada may use the broader policy framework to decide whether citizens of a given country generally require a visa before travelling.
Once an individual from a visa-required country submits an application, an officer then evaluates that specific person’s circumstances, intent, and admissibility.
This example is explanatory and does not represent an official IRCC scenario. The 40+ criteria should not be described as a forty-point checklist scored against every applicant.
What IRCC Checks On An Individual Canada Visitor Visa Application
IRCC says visitor visa applicants undergo a thorough assessment of their intent and personal circumstances.
Officers manually review temporary resident visa applications and evaluate visitor intent based on indicators and information the department has identified.
The factors IRCC says it examines include:
- Travel history
- Family ties to the applicant’s home country
- Employment
- Immigration status
- Marital status
- Family history
- Work and education history
- Purpose of the visit to Canada
- Supporting documents
- Ability and intention to leave Canada at the end of the authorized stay
- Ability to support themselves during their stay
- Health admissibility
- Security admissibility
- Criminal admissibility
IRCC states that all inadmissibility assessments require a case-by-case analysis based on the facts of the case and the evidence before the decision maker.
The department does not prescribe minimum bank balances, financial thresholds, or scoring systems in this disclosure.
Having limited travel history or a particular employment situation does not automatically result in a refusal. Each application is weighed individually on its own merits.
Cases may be referred for comprehensive screening by the Canada Border Services Agency or the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.
IRCC frames this referral process with the words “may be referred,” indicating it is not a routine step applied to every application.
India And China Are Canada’s Top Visa-Required Source Countries
IRCC explicitly identifies China and India as the top visa-required source countries.
This reflects the scale of visitor visa demand from these two countries rather than any specific risk characterization.
The transition binder does not provide refusal rates, fraud rates, or nationality-specific risk assessments for either country in this section.
IRCC’s tighter screening applies across its visitor-integrity strategy and is not attributed specifically to India or China simply because they generate the highest volume of applications.
What Is Canada’s Global Risk Framework?
IRCC launched the Global Risk Framework for the temporary resident visa line of business in September 2025.
The GRF proactively monitors the department’s overall ability to manage integrity risks. IRCC describes it as an early-warning system for macro-level decision-making integrity.
The framework identifies risks and enables interventions intended to mitigate emerging integrity issues.
IRCC says the need for a more proactive approach was highlighted by the integrity strategy launched in summer 2024 to address growing misuse and irregular migration by TRV holders.
The GRF operates at the macro level and does not automatically approve or refuse individual visitor visa applications.
It supports the department’s capacity to detect systemic patterns and respond before problems escalate.
Biometrics And Information Sharing Are Central To Screening
Visa-required applicants generally provide fingerprints and a photograph for biometric identity screening, subject to limited exceptions.
IRCC says this biometric information is shared with allies. Canada handles nearly 3.5 million biometric enrolments per year.
The country maintains a significant biometric collection infrastructure around the world.
IRCC says Canada has 166 Visa Application Centres overseas, 82 Service Canada locations, and 130 U.S. Application Service Centres.
Biometrics strengthen identity management and enable screening against RCMP records of known criminals, past refugee claimants, persons previously deported, and prior immigration applicants.
Appearing in a prior immigration record does not by itself indicate anything adverse about an applicant.
IRCC frames biometric screening as a tool to support better-informed admissibility decisions rather than an automated disqualification mechanism.
Some Cases Can Be Referred To CBSA Or CSIS
IRCC says cases may be referred for comprehensive screening by the Canada Border Services Agency and/or the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.
The transition binder does not specify the circumstances or threshold that trigger such a referral.
The wording “may be referred” indicates that these referrals are not described as a standard step applied to every visitor visa application.
Visitor Visa Versus eTA Screening
Canada screens visitors through two primary authorization streams, and the level of scrutiny differs substantially between them.
Temporary Resident Visa
The TRV application collects comprehensive details including name, date of birth, place of birth, biometrics, immigration status, marital status, travel history, family history, work and education history, purpose of visit, and supporting documents.
Screening requires biometrics and includes an assessment of traveller intent. An officer manually reviews each application, and the applicant must submit their passport for physical inspection.
A visa counterfoil is physically placed into the passport when the application is approved.
IRCC says the maximum validity of a TRV is 10 years, and it may be issued for single or multiple entries depending on the case.
The fee is $100 plus an $85 biometric fee.
Electronic Travel Authorization
The eTA is fully digital and collects basic, self-declared client information. Biometrics are not required.
Screening checks for known or self-declared adverse or inadmissibility-related information. IRCC says 85% to 90% of eTA applications are automatically approved by the system within minutes.
Some applications require manual review and a decision by an officer based on known or self-declared information.
An eTA is valid for up to five years or until passport expiry, whichever occurs sooner, and allows multiple entries.
The eTA is valid in air mode only, meaning it covers travel to Canada by plane. The fee is $7. IRCC identifies the United Kingdom and France as the top eTA source countries.
What Tighter Canada Visitor Visa Screening Means For Applicants
Based on the factors IRCC says it assesses, applicants should expect the department to closely examine several aspects of their applications.
Whether the stated purpose of travel is credible will be evaluated. Officers will assess whether the applicant’s circumstances support a genuine intention to stay temporarily.
Travel history, employment, personal circumstances, and ties outside Canada all factor into the assessment.
Supporting documentation must be consistent, complete, and verifiable. Admissibility related to health, security, and criminality will be checked.
Identity will be confirmed through biometrics. IRCC’s emphasis on case-by-case assessment means there is no single formula that guarantees approval or triggers refusal.
Applicants benefit from submitting truthful, complete, and internally consistent applications that clearly demonstrate temporary intent and the ability to support themselves during their stay.
Any practical inferences here are drawn from the factors IRCC says it assesses, not from explicit application advice in the transition binder.
IRCC’s 2026 Deputy Minister transition binder provides an unusually detailed look at the machinery behind Canada’s visitor screening system.
The department has confirmed that more than 40 criteria underpin the country-level visa policy framework, that a separate and thorough individual assessment applies to each visitor visa applicant, and that recent integrity measures have reduced fraud and tightened screening.
With approximately 5.8 million visitor applications expected in 2026, the stakes are high for both Canada and the millions of people who want to visit.
Applicants should understand that Canada’s screening has become more rigorous, that every application is assessed on its own facts and evidence, and that the department is actively monitoring global migration trends through tools like the Global Risk Framework.
The clearest takeaway is that Canada continues facilitating legitimate visitor travel while using more proactive, risk-based tools to strengthen program integrity.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Does every Canada visitor visa applicant get assessed against the 40+ criteria?
No, the more than 40 criteria operate at the country visa policy level and inform whether citizens of a specific country are subject to a visa requirement or can benefit from visa-exempt travel. Visa-exempt foreign nationals travelling to Canada by air generally require an eTA, subject to limited exceptions. Individual visitor visa applicants undergo a separate case-by-case assessment focused on their personal circumstances, intent, supporting documents and admissibility.
What factors does IRCC assess on an individual Canada visitor visa application?
IRCC says officers evaluate travel history, family ties to the home country, employment, immigration status, marital status, family history, work and education history, the purpose of the visit, supporting documents, the ability and intention to leave Canada after the authorized stay, the ability to self-support during the stay, and admissibility related to health, security, and criminality. All inadmissibility assessments require case-by-case analysis based on the facts and evidence before the decision maker.
What is Canada’s Global Risk Framework for visitor visas?
The Global Risk Framework was launched in September 2025 for the temporary resident visa line of business. IRCC describes it as a proactive monitoring system that acts as an early-warning tool for macro-level decision-making integrity. It identifies emerging risks and enables interventions to mitigate them. The GRF does not automatically approve or refuse individual applications and operates at a systemic level rather than an applicant level.
How many visitor applications does Canada expect in 2026?
IRCC projects approximately 5.8 million visitor applications in 2026. This figure includes both temporary resident visas and electronic travel authorizations. In 2025, IRCC approved 3,371,700 eTAs and 2,185,800 TRVs, totalling 5,557,500 visitor applications. Volumes are expected to decrease slightly to almost 5.5 million in 2027.
Is the eTA screening as strict as the visitor visa screening?
No, the eTA is a lighter-touch, fully digital pre-travel screening tool that does not require biometrics. IRCC says 85% to 90% of eTA applications are automatically approved within minutes. The temporary resident visa requires a detailed application, biometric enrolment, manual officer review, a physical passport inspection, and a thorough assessment of traveller intent. The two streams reflect different risk levels, with visa-required nationals receiving significantly more scrutiny.
Fact-Checked: All visitor visa screening criteria, visitor application volumes, biometric enrolment figures, Visa Application Centre counts, eTA approval percentages, Mexico asylum claim statistics, Qatar visa exemption details, and Global Risk Framework information cited in this article were verified against the IRCC Deputy Minister Transition Binder 2026: Temporary Immigration: How Visitors Come to Canada as published on Canada.ca with a page date of September 4, 2026.
Disclaimer: This article is for general information only and does not constitute immigration, legal, or travel advice. Visitor visa applicants should review the latest instructions on the official Government of Canada immigration website before applying and should consult a licensed immigration professional for guidance specific to their situation.
Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.
You may also like: New OAS Payments Coming On September 25, 2026
New Minimum Wage In Canada’s 5 Provinces Effective October 1
New OAS Payment Increase Coming In October 2026
New Canada Benefit Payments Still Coming In September 2026
- New CPP Payments To Be Sent Canada-Wide On September 25
Millions of retirees will receive the next Canada Pension Plan deposit, with CPP payments scheduled for Friday, September 25, according to Service Canada.
The maximum CPP retirement pension for someone starting at age 65 in January 2026 is $1,507.65 per month, while the current average for new age-65 beneficiaries is $877.01 per month.
CPP benefits already in pay received a 2.0% annual cost-of-living adjustment for 2026, applied automatically to every monthly deposit beginning with the January 2026 payment.
Understanding the Canada Pension Plan is important for newcomers, prospective immigrants planning their move to Canada, workers already building careers here, and senior Canadians alike, because CPP reflects the strength of Canada’s social security system and highlights why long-term retirement planning.
This article breaks down the September 25 CPP payment, current maximum and average retirement amounts, upcoming payment dates, and key details retirees should know.
Table of Contents
Current Maximum CPP Payments For 2026
The following amounts use 2026 maximums for new benefits beginning in January 2026 and current averages from more recent beneficiary data, as listed on the official CPP pensions and benefits monthly amounts page.
Actual payments vary based on each individual’s contribution history, pensionable earnings, and the age at which the benefit began.
- Retirement pension (at age 65): $1,507.65 per month maximum, $877.01 per month average for new beneficiaries.
- Disability benefit: $1,741.20 per month maximum, $1,234.68 per month average for new beneficiaries.
- Survivor’s pension (younger than 65): $803.54 per month maximum, $549.62 per month average.
- Survivor’s pension (65 and older): $904.59 per month maximum, $339.36 per month average.
- Children of disabled or deceased contributors (under 18 or full-time students): $307.81 per month.
- Children of disabled or deceased contributors (part-time student aged 18 to 25): $153.91 per month.
- Post-retirement benefit (at age 65): $54.69 per month maximum.
- Death benefit: A one-time base payment of up to $2,500, with an additional $2,500 top-up available when the deceased never received a CPP/QPP retirement, disability, or post-retirement disability benefit and does not leave a spouse or common-law partner eligible for a survivor pension, bringing the maximum to $5,000.
The disability benefit combines a flat-rate portion with an earnings-related component, which is why it exceeds the retirement pension maximum for many recipients.
Survivor pension amounts depend on the deceased contributor’s record and the surviving spouse or partner’s age at the time the benefit begins.
Combined benefits apply when a survivor also collects their own CPP retirement pension, though the total is subject to a separate combined maximum of $1,531.56 per month.
Who Receives CPP Payments On September 25
The federal CPP payment calendar lists retirement, disability, survivor, and children’s benefits on the September 25 schedule, along with post-retirement and post-retirement disability benefits.
Retirement pension recipients form the largest group, consisting of anyone who contributed to CPP during their working career and chose to begin collecting between age 60 and age 70.
- Starting at 60 locks in a permanent 36% reduction calculated at 0.6% for each month before age 65.
- Waiting until 70 secures a permanent 42% increase calculated at 0.7% for each month beyond age 65.
Disability benefit recipients qualify when a severe and prolonged medical condition prevents them from working, with additional medical eligibility criteria required beyond standard CPP contributions.
Survivor pension recipients are the spouses or common-law partners of deceased CPP contributors who applied through Service Canada.
Children’s benefits can cover eligible children under 18 and students aged 18 to 25 attending a recognized school or university full-time or part-time, with part-time students receiving half the full-time flat-rate benefit.
Workers in every province and territory except Quebec contribute to CPP through payroll deductions during their careers.
Quebec workers generally contribute to the Quebec Pension Plan instead, which operates as a parallel program with comparable benefit types.
CPP Contribution Rates And Earnings Ceilings For 2026
Understanding how contributions work helps current workers estimate what their future pension might look like.
The Year’s Basic Exemption remains at $3,500 for 2026, meaning no CPP contributions apply to the first $3,500 of employment income.
The Year’s maximum pensionable earnings sit at $74,600 for 2026, and employees and employers each pay 5.95% on earnings between the basic exemption and that ceiling.
The maximum annual base CPP contribution for an employee or employer in 2026 is $4,230.45 each.
A second contribution tier known as CPP2 applies a 4% rate on earnings between $74,600 and the Year’s Additional Maximum Pensionable Earnings of $85,000.
The maximum annual CPP2 contribution is $416 for employees and $416 for employers.
Self-employed Canadians pay both sides of the contribution, bringing their maximum base CPP to $8,460.90 and their maximum CPP2 to $832 for 2026.
CPP2 will eventually boost future pension amounts for higher earners, but the full CPP2 benefit will not be available to anyone retiring before the mid-2060s because the enhancement is being phased in over approximately 40 years.
How The Age You Start CPP Changes Your Payment Permanently
The decision of when to begin collecting CPP is one of the most consequential retirement income choices a Canadian worker can make.
There is no single correct answer because the ideal starting age depends entirely on your health, other income sources, and financial goals.
A person whose calculated age-65 pension would be $1,000 per month would receive only $640 per month by starting at age 60 due to the 36% early reduction.
That same person would receive $1,420 per month by deferring until age 70 due to the 42% late-start increase.
Both adjustments are permanent and remain locked in for life once the first payment is issued.
The reduction or increase is not recalculated at age 65 or at any other point, which makes the timing decision particularly important.
Service Canada provides personalized pension estimates at ages 60, 65, and 70 through your My Service Canada Account, allowing you to compare scenarios using your actual contribution history.
How To Apply For CPP Benefits
CPP is not automatic, regardless of your age or how long you contributed during your working years.
You must submit a formal application through Service Canada before any payments begin.
The fastest route is applying online through your My Service Canada Account, which allows digital submission, document uploads, and status tracking.
You can also apply by mailing a completed Application for a Canada Pension Plan Retirement Pension using Form ISP-1000 or by visiting a Service Canada centre in person.
Service Canada recommends applying in advance, and you can submit a CPP retirement pension application up to 12 months before your chosen start date.
Online applications currently have an expected processing time of approximately 28 days, while paper applications can take up to 120 days.
For CPP disability benefits, applicants must submit Form ISP-1151 along with supporting medical documentation from their healthcare provider.
Survivor pension applications require Form ISP-1300, and supporting documents such as proof of the contributor’s death and the relationship may be requested.
If you continue working while receiving CPP retirement before age 70, your ongoing contributions generate post-retirement benefits that add a small amount to your monthly pension each January.
The maximum post-retirement benefit for a full year of contributions at the maximum pensionable earnings level is $54.69 per month in 2026.
After age 70, contributions stop regardless of employment status, and no further post-retirement benefits accumulate.
Tax Considerations For CPP Recipients
CPP payments are classified as taxable income by the Canada Revenue Agency.
Service Canada does not automatically withhold income tax from CPP payments unless the recipient specifically requests it.
You can arrange for federal income tax withholding by completing Form ISP3520CPP, by calling Service Canada, or by updating your preferences through your My Service Canada Account.
If CPP is your sole income source, the basic personal amount may shield most or all of it from taxation.
However, recipients with additional income from private pensions, investment returns, or part-time employment often benefit from having tax withheld at source to avoid a balance owing at filing time.
Service Canada issues a T4A(P) tax slip each year showing CPP benefits received and any income tax deducted.
Planning your tax withholding strategy around your total income picture can prevent unwelcome surprises during tax season.
Remaining CPP Payment Dates For 2026
After September 25, three more CPP deposits remain on the 2026 federal benefits payment calendar.
- October 28, 2026
- November 26, 2026
- December 22, 2026
These dates apply equally to CPP retirement pensions, CPP disability benefits, CPP survivor pensions, CPP children’s benefits, and post-retirement benefits.
Service Canada has not yet published the official 2027 payment calendar as of September 2026.
What To Do If Your Payment Does Not Arrive
Direct-deposit payments are scheduled for September 25, although bank posting times can vary.
Cheque recipients should expect longer delivery times because Service Canada mails cheques during the last three business days of the month.
If your September 25 deposit has not arrived, wait at least five to ten business days before contacting Service Canada.
You can reach Service Canada at 1-800-277-9914 to report a missing payment or start a payment inquiry.
Before calling, confirm that your direct deposit banking information and mailing address are current through your My Service Canada Account.
Common reasons for delayed or missing payments include outdated banking details, an unresolved overpayment from a previous period, or a processing hold related to documentation.
Protecting Yourself From Benefit Scams
Service Canada will never ask you to provide personal information by phone, text, email, or social media in connection with your CPP deposit.
Always use official government portals rather than links in unsolicited messages when checking your payment status or updating account information.
If you receive a suspicious call or message claiming to be from Service Canada, hang up and call the official number directly to verify.
Report suspected scams to the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre so authorities can track emerging patterns and alert other Canadians.
The next CPP deposit after September lands on Wednesday, October 28, 2026.
CPP amounts will remain unchanged because the annual indexation holds through December, with the next potential adjustment arriving in January 2027.
That upcoming 2027 increase will be calculated using CPI data from the 12 months ending October 2026 compared to the same period one year earlier, and the exact rate will be confirmed by Service Canada later this year.
Recipients should verify that their direct deposit details and mailing address are current before each payment cycle through My Service Canada Account to avoid any disruptions.
The September 25 CPP deposit reinforces the program’s role as a dependable pillar of financial stability for millions of Canadians.
Whether you rely on CPP as a primary retirement income source, receive disability support during a difficult period, or collect survivor benefits after the loss of a family member, the monthly consistency of this program provides genuine peace of mind.
With the 2.0% annual indexation protecting purchasing power and the CPP enhancement quietly building higher benefits for future generations, the Canada Pension Plan continues adapting to the financial pressures facing Canadian households.
Confirm your deposit on September 25, review your account through My Service Canada Account, and keep your personal records aligned with the official benefit amounts so nothing falls through the cracks.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Will my CPP payment increase in January 2027?
Yes, Service Canada will apply an annual indexation increase in January 2027, which will then remain fixed for every monthly CPP deposit through December 2027. CPP benefits in pay only adjust once per year at the start of the calendar year. Maximum amounts for new CPP benefits can shift slightly during the year under the enhancement rules, but that only affects people starting a brand-new benefit.
What happens to my CPP contributions if I pass away before collecting a retirement pension?
Your contributions do not disappear. Eligible survivors can claim multiple CPP benefits from your contribution record. The death benefit provides a one-time base payment of up to $2,500 to your estate. An additional $2,500 top-up may apply when the deceased never received a CPP/QPP retirement, disability, or post-retirement disability benefit and does not leave a spouse or common-law partner eligible for a survivor pension, bringing the maximum death benefit to $5,000. A surviving spouse or common-law partner may also qualify for the CPP survivor’s pension, which pays up to $803.54 per month for recipients younger than 65 or up to $904.59 for those 65 and older. Dependent children under 18 or attending school full-time can receive the children’s benefit of $307.81 per month, while eligible part-time students receive $153.91.
How do I find out my exact CPP retirement pension amount instead of relying on the national average?
Sign into your My Service Canada Account and navigate to the Canada Pension Plan section. Your account displays personalized estimates at ages 60, 65, and 70 based on your actual contribution record, including any dropout provisions that apply to your file. If you are already receiving CPP, the account shows your gross amount, tax deductions, and the net figure deposited each month. This personal estimate is always more accurate than the national average of $877.01 for planning purposes.
Does the September 25 CPP payment apply to people living outside Canada?
In most cases, yes. Service Canada can pay CPP retirement and survivor benefits to recipients living in other countries. Canada maintains social security agreements with more than 60 nations, and these agreements protect benefit entitlements when someone relocates abroad. Recipients living in a country without a social security agreement may still qualify depending on the length of their Canadian contribution history. Contact Service Canada before moving internationally to confirm how your specific CPP benefits will be affected.
Can I increase my CPP pension if I keep working after I start collecting it?
Yes, if you are under 70. When you work while receiving a CPP retirement pension before age 70, your continued contributions generate post-retirement benefits that are added to your monthly pension each January. The maximum post-retirement benefit for a full year of maximum contributions in 2026 is $54.69 per month. From age 65 to 69, contributing is optional and you can elect to stop. Contributions are mandatory between ages 60 and 64 if you are working and receiving CPP. After age 70, all CPP contributions cease regardless of employment status.
Fact-Checked: All CPP payment amounts, contribution rates, earnings ceilings, and 2026 deposit dates in this article were verified against the official Government of Canada CPP pensions and benefits monthly amounts page, the federal benefits payment calendar, and the Maximum benefit amounts and related figures publication as of September 21, 2026.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and does not constitute financial, legal, or tax advice. Contact Service Canada or a qualified professional for guidance on your specific pension situation.
Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.
You may also like: New OAS Payments Coming On September 25, 2026
New Minimum Wage In Canada’s 5 Provinces Effective October 1
New OAS Payment Increase Coming In October 2026
New Canada Benefit Payments Still Coming In September 2026
- New Canada LMIA Rules Now Clarify Who Can Hire Foreign Workers
Service Canada published updated employer guidance across multiple major Temporary Foreign Worker Program streams on September 18, 2026, establishing explicit criteria for determining which entity qualifies as the employer when a Labour Market Impact Assessment application is assessed.
The new guidance defines who Service Canada considers the true employer of a temporary foreign worker and outlines the factors officers will evaluate during the LMIA review process.
It also addresses two arrangements that have generated growing concern in the program: staffing agencies applying for LMIAs on behalf of workers who actually perform duties for another business and employers classifying temporary foreign workers as independent contractors instead of employees.
The September 18 update is published employer-assessment guidance, not a new law passed by Parliament or a formal regulation change under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations.
Employment and Social Development Canada, the federal department that administers the LMIA process through Service Canada, added the guidance to its program requirements pages for employers.
IRCC, which handles immigration status and work permits separately, was not the authority behind this particular update, although LMIA decisions feed directly into the work permit application process that IRCC administers.
Table of Contents
Canada Updates LMIA Employer Requirements
The updated guidance appears under a section titled “Employers” and marked “New: September 18, 2026” across multiple official TFWP program-requirements pages, including the high-wage stream, the low-wage stream, the Global Talent Stream, the Agricultural Stream, the Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program, the in-home caregiver program, LMIAs supporting permanent residence, and the Recognized Employer Pilot.
These pages contain the same core employer definition, assessment criteria, staffing-agency restriction, and independent-contractor provisions, establishing a consistent employer-employee relationship standard across these TFWP pathways.
The September update follows other recent changes to TFWP guidance, including an August 18 update to the low-wage workforce-cap requirements for employers with fewer than ten employees at a work location, and continues a pattern of ESDC tightening program requirements that began with the October 2024 reforms.
Who Is Considered The Employer For An LMIA?
Under the September 18 guidance, Service Canada defines an employer as the entity that hires the temporary foreign worker, sets their working conditions, and directly pays them.
That entity can be a person, a business, a corporation, or an organization.
When reviewing an LMIA application, Service Canada will determine whether the applicant is actually the employer by evaluating a series of factors that collectively describe the real working relationship between the entity and the worker.
The assessment factors published in the updated guidance include:
- Who is obligated to meet all TFWP requirements under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and its regulations
- Who directly benefits from the work performed by the temporary foreign worker
- Who has the authority to decide where, when, and how the work will be done
- Who is responsible for paying wages and other compensation
- Who employs the workers, determines job duties, defines job expectations, and monitors performance
- Who has the authority to fire or dismiss the worker
- Who the temporary foreign worker recognizes as their employer
- Who signs and concludes the employment agreement as the employer on or before the first day of work
- What the characteristics of the relationship between the employer and the worker are, including management, supervision, remuneration, and administration of statutory benefits such as income tax, CPP, QPP, and Employment Insurance
The guidance further states that an employer-employee relationship exists when an employer hires a worker, directs their duties, and pays them for their work.
The employer must make an offer of employment and provide employment for a specified period of time to the temporary foreign worker, who provides labour in return for compensation.
This relationship is confirmed in the employment agreement that both the employer and the worker sign on or before the first day of work, and it helps ensure that a genuine job offer exists with a set wage rate and clear working conditions.
New LMIA Guidance For Staffing And Employment Agencies
One of the most significant elements of the September 18 update is a direct statement about staffing and employment agencies.
The official guidance states that staffing or employment agencies who recruit workers for other businesses are not considered employers under the Temporary Foreign Worker Program.
It adds that such agencies cannot be approved to hire a temporary foreign worker for other businesses because an employer-employee relationship does not exist in that arrangement.
This language is published identically across the TFWP program requirements pages that received the September 18 update, including the high-wage, low-wage, Global Talent Stream, agricultural stream, Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program, in-home caregiver, permanent residence supporting LMIA, and Recognized Employer Pilot pages.
It is important to understand precisely what this guidance says and does not say, especially for employers and workers navigating multi-party hiring arrangements.
The guidance targets a specific scenario: an agency recruits a foreign worker, applies for the LMIA, but the worker actually performs their daily duties for a separate client business that controls the work.
In that scenario, the agency would not qualify as the employer because the required employer-employee relationship does not exist between the agency and the worker.
Service Canada would assess the actual working arrangement using the published employer factors to determine which entity qualifies as the employer.
Example (for illustration, not an official government scenario): A staffing company based in Ontario recruits a food processing worker from overseas and submits an LMIA application naming itself as the employer.
However, the worker will report daily to a meat processing plant owned by a separate company, which sets the schedule, assigns duties, supervises performance, and determines the working conditions.
Under the September 18 guidance, Service Canada would evaluate who actually controls the work, pays the wages, sets the schedule, and benefits from the labour.
If those factors point to the meat processing plant rather than the staffing company, Service Canada could determine that the agency is not the employer for TFWP purposes, and the LMIA application would not be approved under the agency.
The guidance does not say that staffing agencies are banned from operating in Canada or that all agency-based employment arrangements are invalid.
It specifically addresses the situation where the required employer-employee relationship between the LMIA applicant and the worker does not exist because a different entity actually functions as the employer.
Temporary Foreign Workers Cannot Simply Be Classified As Contractors
The September 18 update also contains explicit language about employer misclassification of temporary foreign workers as independent contractors.
The guidance states that employers cannot classify temporary foreign workers as independent contractors.
It describes misclassification as non-compliant under the TFWP and explains that this practice can weaken wage protections, allow employers to avoid required deductions for income tax, CPP, or QPP, and Employment Insurance, and violate federal or provincial employment laws.
Employers must ensure that a worker’s status reflects the employer-employee relationship identified in the approved LMIA and the employment agreement.
The guidance explicitly states that employers will not be approved to hire a temporary foreign worker where an employer-employee relationship does not exist.
It also addresses post-approval behaviour: after receiving an approved LMIA, employers cannot reclassify a temporary foreign worker as an independent contractor or structure the relationship to avoid payroll, compensation, or program requirements.
Non-compliant employers face consequences including administrative monetary penalties and bans from the TFWP, and they could be publicly listed on federal or provincial government websites such as the Labour Program’s public naming database of employers found in violation of the Canada Labour Code.
The guidance specifically references the trucking sector, pointing to ESDC’s existing awareness kit on misclassification in the road transportation industry as additional context.
Which LMIA Streams Have The September 18 Update?
Service Canada added the new Employers section to multiple Temporary Foreign Worker Program requirements pages on September 18, 2026.
The updated employer definition and assessment framework is confirmed on the program requirements pages for:
- the high-wage stream
- the low-wage stream
- the Global Talent Stream
- the Agricultural Stream
- the Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program
- in-home caregivers
- LMIAs supporting permanent residence
- the Recognized Employer Pilot
Each of these pages now sets out the same core criteria for determining whether the LMIA applicant is genuinely the employer, along with the restrictions involving staffing agencies and the misclassification of temporary foreign workers as independent contractors.
What This Means For Foreign Workers
For temporary foreign workers currently in Canada or planning to arrive, the September 18 guidance reinforces the importance of understanding who the actual employer is in any LMIA-based work arrangement.
The entity named as the employer on an LMIA application and employment agreement should be the same entity that hires the worker, directly pays their wages, sets their schedule, supervises their work, and has the authority to terminate the employment.
Workers should verify that their employment agreement is signed by the same entity that will actually control their daily working conditions, because the LMIA and employment agreement must reflect the real working relationship.
If a worker discovers that they are reporting to a different company than the one named on their LMIA or work permit, that disconnect could create compliance issues that affect both the employer and the worker.
The guidance does not say that workers currently in Canada on valid work permits will automatically lose their status as a result of this update, and workers who believe they are experiencing abuse or exploitation can apply for an open work permit for vulnerable workers through IRCC.
What Employers Should Review Before Filing An LMIA
Any employer preparing a new LMIA application after September 18, 2026, should evaluate whether their arrangement aligns with the published employer definition and assessment factors.
A practical review checklist based on the official assessment criteria would include confirming:
- The entity applying for the LMIA is the same entity that will directly hire and employ the worker
- The employment agreement will be signed by that entity as the employer on or before the first day of work
- That entity will be responsible for directly paying wages, including statutory deductions for income tax, CPP or QPP, and Employment Insurance
- That entity will determine the work location, schedule, duties, and performance expectations
- That entity retains the authority to dismiss or terminate the worker
- The worker will recognize that entity as their employer in practice
- No third-party client or staffing agency arrangement exists that would shift the actual employment relationship to a different entity
- The worker is classified as an employee, not an independent contractor, for payroll and employment law purposes
Employers who currently use staffing agencies, labour brokers, or client-placement models to deploy temporary foreign workers should review those arrangements carefully against the published factors before submitting any new LMIA application.
Does This Affect Existing LMIAs Or Work Permits?
The September 18 guidance itself does not announce any automatic cancellation of existing positive LMIAs or revocation of work permits already issued by IRCC.
It does not establish a transition period, a deadline for employers to restructure existing arrangements, or a retroactive application date.
The published guidance describes the criteria that Service Canada will apply when assessing LMIA applications, and it describes compliance obligations that already exist under the TFWP’s employer compliance regime.
Employers found to be non-compliant with program conditions can face administrative monetary penalties and program bans under the existing compliance framework, but the September 18 guidance does not create a new enforcement mechanism.
Workers holding valid employer-specific work permits issued before September 18 should not assume their permits are automatically invalidated by this guidance update.
Employers may still be inspected for compliance with the conditions attached to their LMIA and employment relationship for up to six years after the temporary foreign worker starts working.
Service Canada advises employers to retain relevant records during this period.
The September 18 guidance itself, however, does not state that existing positive LMIAs are automatically reassessed under the newly published employer criteria.
This new employer guidance published by Service Canada formalizes assessment criteria that give officers a clear framework for evaluating whether an LMIA applicant is genuinely the employer of a temporary foreign worker.
By publishing identical language across the high-wage, low-wage, Global Talent Stream, agricultural, Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program, in-home caregiver, permanent residence, and Recognized Employer Pilot requirements, ESDC has signalled that the employer-employee relationship standard applies consistently across these TFWP pathways.
The staffing agency provision directly addresses arrangements in which an agency recruits a temporary foreign worker for another business even though the required employer-employee relationship does not exist between the agency and the worker.
The independent contractor provision reinforces that the TFWP requires a genuine employment relationship and that misclassification will not be tolerated.
For employers, the practical message is straightforward: the entity that applies for the LMIA must genuinely function as the employer based on the factors Service Canada considers, including hiring, supervision, wage payment, and termination authority.
For foreign workers, the guidance underscores the importance of verifying that the employer named on the LMIA and employment agreement is the same entity that actually employs them in practice.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Can a staffing agency still apply for an LMIA to hire a temporary foreign worker in Canada?
Under the September 18, 2026, guidance, staffing or employment agencies that recruit workers for other businesses are not considered employers under the Temporary Foreign Worker Program because the required employer-employee relationship does not exist between the agency and the worker when a separate business controls the daily work. The guidance does not ban staffing agencies from operating in Canada, but it does mean an agency cannot be approved as the LMIA employer if another entity functions as the actual employer in practice.
Does the September 18, 2026 LMIA update cancel any existing work permits?
The published guidance does not announce automatic cancellation of existing work permits or positive LMIAs. It describes the assessment criteria Service Canada will apply when evaluating LMIA applications going forward. Workers holding valid work permits should not assume their permits are automatically affected, although employers may face compliance scrutiny under the current TFWP enforcement framework.
How does Service Canada determine who is the real employer for an LMIA?
Service Canada evaluates multiple factors, including who hires the worker, who directly pays wages and makes statutory deductions, who controls where, when, and how the work is performed, who supervises and monitors performance, who has the authority to dismiss the worker, who signs the employment agreement, and who the worker recognizes as their employer. Service Canada considers these factors collectively when determining whether the LMIA applicant is actually the employer.
Can a Canadian employer classify a temporary foreign worker as an independent contractor?
No, the September 18, 2026, guidance states that employers cannot classify temporary foreign workers as independent contractors. Misclassification is non-compliant under the TFWP and can result in administrative monetary penalties, bans from the program, and public naming on government websites. Employers also cannot reclassify a worker as a contractor after receiving an approved LMIA.
Which LMIA streams contain the new September 18, 2026 employer guidance?
The September 18 employer guidance is confirmed across multiple TFWP program-requirements pages, including the high-wage stream, low-wage stream, Global Talent Stream, Agricultural Stream, Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program, in-home caregivers, LMIAs supporting permanent residence, and the Recognized Employer Pilot.
Fact-Checked: All employer definition criteria, staffing-agency provisions, independent-contractor restrictions, and enforcement consequences cited in this article were verified against the official ESDC program requirements for the Temporary Foreign Worker Program as published on Canada.ca with a page date of September 18, 2026.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or immigration advice. Employers and foreign workers should consult a qualified immigration professional or review the official Service Canada employer compliance guidance for requirements specific to their situation.
Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.
You may also like: New OAS Payments Coming On September 25, 2026
New Minimum Wage In Canada’s 5 Provinces Effective October 1
New OAS Payment Increase Coming In October 2026
New Canada Benefit Payments Still Coming In September 2026
- New Canada Benefit Payments Still Coming In September 2026
10 major Canada benefit payments and assistance deposits are still coming before September ends, split evenly between 5 federal and 5 provincial programs.
These benefit payments are scheduled across four dates between September 23 and September 29, covering federal pensions and seniors benefits, disability payments, and provincial income-support programs.
Several of the largest federal programs, including the Canada Child Benefit on September 18 and the Canada Disability Benefit on September 17, have already been issued earlier this month.
Some of the payments still ahead include monthly pensions of up to $1,507.65 per month and provincial disability assistance exceeding $1,400 for eligible recipients.
This guide breaks down every major federal and provincial payment still scheduled for September, including payment dates, maximum amounts, eligibility context and a complete month-end payment summary.
Table of Contents
Federal Benefit Payments Still Coming In September 2026
Canada Pension Plan Payment – September 25
The next Canada Pension Plan payment is confirmed for Thursday, September 25, 2026, according to the official Government of Canada benefits payment calendar.
The maximum CPP retirement pension for a recipient who began collecting at age 65 in January 2026 is $1,507.65 per month, as published on the Government of Canada CPP payment amounts page.
The average monthly CPP retirement pension for new beneficiaries at age 65 is currently $877.01, according to the same federal source.
Actual CPP retirement pension amounts vary based on each individual’s contribution history, pensionable earnings throughout their working life, and the age at which they began collecting.
CPP benefits received a 2.0% annual indexation increase in January 2026, and that rate applies to every monthly payment throughout the calendar year.
The September 25 payment date also applies to CPP disability benefits, survivor pensions, children’s benefits, and post-retirement benefits.
Workers in Quebec generally contribute to the Quebec Pension Plan instead of CPP.
Old Age Security And GIS Payments – September 25
Old Age Security, the Guaranteed Income Supplement, the Allowance, and the Allowance for the Survivor are all confirmed for Thursday, September 25, 2026, on the same payment date as CPP.
The September 25 deposit is the third and final payment at the July to September 2026 quarterly rates, which reflected a 1.2% quarterly increase, the largest adjustment in effect so far during 2026.
For the July to September 2026 quarter, the maximum monthly OAS pension is $751.97 for seniors aged 65 to 74 and $827.17 for seniors aged 75 and older.
The maximum monthly Guaranteed Income Supplement for a single, widowed, or divorced pensioner is $1,123.17 for this quarter.
GIS amounts depend heavily on marital status and income other than OAS, and the supplement reduces as income rises.
Seniors who qualify for the full OAS pension must have 40 years of Canadian residence after age 18, while those with fewer qualifying years receive a proportionally smaller partial pension.
Higher-income recipients may also have their OAS reduced by the recovery tax, which begins when 2025 net world income exceeds $93,454 for the July 2026 to June 2027 repayment period.
The Allowance and Allowance for the Survivor follow the same September 25 deposit schedule and the same quarterly indexation.
Newfoundland And Labrador Disability Benefit – September 25
The Newfoundland and Labrador Disability Benefit is confirmed for Friday, September 25, 2026, according to the official Government of Canada benefits payment calendar.
This provincial benefit provides up to $400 per month to eligible residents of Newfoundland and Labrador between the ages of 18 and 64 who hold a valid Disability Tax Credit certificate from the CRA.
The NLDB is administered by the Canada Revenue Agency on behalf of the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador.
The full $400 monthly amount is available where adjusted family net income is below $29,402.
For individuals and couples where one person qualifies for the DTC, a partial benefit is available up to $42,404.
Where both spouses or common-law partners qualify for the DTC, the partial-benefit threshold extends to $55,404.
No separate NLDB application is required, but recipients must meet the age, residency, DTC, income and tax-filing requirements.
The NLDB did not receive an increase for the 2026–27 benefit year and remains capped at $400 per month.
Veteran Disability Pension – September 28
The Veteran Disability Pension payment is confirmed for Monday, September 28, 2026, according to the official Government of Canada benefits payment calendar.
This pension is administered by Veterans Affairs Canada and provides monthly compensation to veterans with a service-related disability.
The amount each veteran receives depends on the assessed degree of disability and individual circumstances, so there is no single universal payment amount.
Veterans who believe they may qualify for a disability pension or who need to update their information can contact Veterans Affairs Canada directly or visit the department’s online portal.
Provincial Benefit Payments Still Coming In September 2026
BC Income And Disability Assistance – September 23
The Government of British Columbia has confirmed that the next income and disability assistance payment date is Wednesday, September 23, 2026.
The September 23 payment covers October 2026 assistance, as B.C. issues payments in the month before the benefit month.
Recipients with the Persons with Disabilities designation can receive up to $1,483.50 per month in combined disability assistance, which includes the support allowance and maximum shelter allowance.
Income assistance recipients without the PWD designation receive lower amounts based on their household circumstances.
Actual payment amounts depend on household composition, shelter costs, and other income. An additional transportation supplement of $52 per month is also available to individuals with the PWD designation.
Recipients can verify their payment status through the My Self Serve portal or by contacting the ministry at 1-866-866-0800.
Alberta Seniors Benefit – September 23
The Alberta Seniors Benefit payment is scheduled for Wednesday, September 23, 2026, based on the provincial payment schedule.
This monthly benefit supports eligible low-income seniors aged 65 and older in Alberta and supplements federal OAS and GIS payments.
For homeowners, renters and lodge residents with no non-deductible income, the maximum annual Alberta Seniors Benefit is $3,946 for a single senior and $5,918 for a senior couple, equivalent to roughly $329 and $493 per month, respectively.
Different maximums apply to some other accommodation categories. Actual benefits decrease as income rises, and the program phases out at specific income thresholds.
For the benefit year that began on July 1, 2026, a single senior with an annual income of $32,690 or less, or a couple with a combined annual income of $53,800 or less, may be eligible.
Seniors who have deferred their OAS pension are not eligible for Alberta seniors financial assistance programs.
Applicants can apply using the Seniors Financial Assistance application form online, and eligibility renews automatically each year from the tax return.
Ontario Disability Support Program – September 29
The Ontario Disability Support Program payment is confirmed for Tuesday, September 29, 2026.
A single ODSP recipient can receive up to $1,436 per month in combined basic needs and shelter support following the 1.9% inflation-based adjustment that took effect on July 1, 2026.
Actual ODSP payments depend on household composition, shelter costs, other income, and whether additional supplementary benefits apply.
The September 29 payment covers September 2026 assistance.
ODSP recipients who also qualify for the federal Canada Disability Benefit receive both payments in full, as Ontario has formally exempted the CDB from social assistance income calculations.
Ontario Works is also scheduled for September 29, with that payment covering October 2026 assistance.
A single recipient can receive up to $733 per month, including basic needs and shelter support.
Ontario Works can also act as interim financial assistance for people who are applying for ODSP and do not have enough money to support themselves while their disability application is being assessed.
If they are financially eligible for Ontario Works and later approved for ODSP, their case can be transferred to the ODSP program.
All The Canada Benefit Payment Dates In September 2026
The following table shows major federal and provincial benefit payments throughout September 2026, including payments that have already been issued earlier in the month and payments that are still scheduled.
Date Benefit Payment Federal / Province Status September 10 Ontario Trillium Benefit Ontario (CRA) Already issued September 17 Canada Disability Benefit Federal (Service Canada) Already issued September 18 Canada Child Benefit Federal (CRA) Already issued September 23 BC Income and Disability Assistance British Columbia Due September 23 September 23 Alberta Seniors Benefit Alberta Due September 23 September 25 Canada Pension Plan Federal (Service Canada) Due September 25 September 25 OAS / GIS / Allowance / Allowance for the Survivor Federal (Service Canada) Due September 25 September 25 Newfoundland and Labrador Disability Benefit NL (CRA) Due September 25 September 28 Veteran Disability Pension Federal (VAC) Due September 28 September 29 Ontario Disability Support Program Ontario Due September 29 September 29 Ontario Works Ontario Due September 29 The Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit and the Advanced Canada Workers Benefit do not have September payments, with their next deposits scheduled for October 5 and October 9, respectively.
What To Do If Your Benefit Payment Does Not Arrive
Direct deposit is generally the fastest way to receive government benefit payments, and most financial institutions post government deposits on the scheduled payment date.
However, bank posting times can vary by institution, and deposits may not appear at exactly the same time for every recipient.
If you receive your benefit by mailed cheque, delivery times depend on Canada Post processing and your location, and cheques typically take longer than direct deposit to arrive.
The Government of Canada advises recipients to wait five to ten business days before contacting the responsible department about a missing payment.
For CRA-administered benefits such as the Canada Child Benefit, Ontario Trillium Benefit, or Newfoundland and Labrador Disability Benefit, check your status through CRA My Account or contact the CRA directly.
For Service Canada payments, including CPP, OAS, GIS, and the Canada Disability Benefit, verify your payment details through My Service Canada Account.
Provincial programs such as ODSP, Ontario Works, and B.C. disability assistance are managed through their respective provincial portals.
October 2026 begins a new OAS benefit quarter, with a confirmed 1.4% increase applying to OAS, GIS, the Allowance and the Allowance for the Survivor starting with the October 28 payment.
CPP is also paid on October 28, but CPP benefits remain at their 2026 rate until the next annual indexation.
The Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit returns with a quarterly payment on October 5, and the Advanced Canada Workers Benefit will issue its third 2026 advance on October 9.
The Canada Child Benefit payment is scheduled for October 20, and the Ontario Trillium Benefit is due on October 9.
Recipients of all government benefits should confirm that their direct deposit information and mailing address are current through CRA My Account or My Service Canada Account before the next payment cycle begins.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Do CPP and OAS arrive on the same date in 2026?
Yes, throughout the official 2026 payment calendar, CPP and OAS share the same scheduled payment dates. GIS, the Allowance and the Allowance for the Survivor follow the OAS schedule.
Can I receive both the federal Canada Disability Benefit and a provincial disability payment at the same time?
In some provinces, yes. Ontario and British Columbia have formally exempted the CDB from their provincial social assistance income calculations, which means eligible recipients of ODSP or B.C. disability assistance can receive both the CDB and their provincial payment in full without one reducing the other. Rules differ by province, and recipients should confirm how the CDB is treated under their specific program.
Will the OAS amount change with the October payment?
OAS is reviewed and adjusted quarterly in January, April, July, and October based on the Consumer Price Index. The October to December 2026 quarterly adjustment has been confirmed at 1.4%, and the new rates will first appear in the October 28 payment. Published OAS rates do not decrease solely because the CPI falls.
When is the September 2026 ODSP payment?
Ontario’s official 2026 ODSP schedule lists Tuesday, September 29, as the payment date for September 2026 income support.
Why did my Canada Child Benefit arrive on September 18 instead of September 20?
The CRA normally targets the 20th of each month for CCB deposits, but September 20, 2026, falls on a Sunday. When a payment date falls on a weekend, the CRA issues the deposit on the last business day before that date, which was Friday, September 18.
Fact-Checked: All payment dates and benefit amounts referenced in this article are verified against official Government of Canada sources, including the benefits payment calendar, the CPP monthly amounts page, the OAS quarterly rate card for July to September 2026, the Canada Disability Benefit program page, the Government of British Columbia income assistance payment dates page, the Government of Ontario ODSP payment schedule, the Government of Alberta seniors benefit page, and the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador disability benefit page, as of September 20, 2026.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and does not constitute financial, legal, or tax advice. Benefit amounts, eligibility criteria, and payment schedules are subject to change. Contact the responsible government department or a qualified professional for guidance on your specific situation.
Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.
You may also like: New OAS Payments Coming On September 25, 2026
New Minimum Wage In Canada’s 5 Provinces Effective October 1
New OAS Payment Increase Coming In October 2026
New Canada Benefit Payments Still Coming In September 2026
- New Minimum Wage Increase In 5 Canadian Provinces Effective October 1
5 Canadian provinces are raising their minimum wage on October 1, 2026, delivering increases that range from 1.5% to 2.5% and putting more money into the pockets of hundreds of thousands of workers across the country.
Manitoba leads the group with the largest increase both by percentage and by cents per hour, while Ontario will have the highest resulting minimum wage among the five at $17.95.
Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island round out the list with their own confirmed adjustments tied to inflation-indexed formulas and provincial policy commitments.
Each of these increases arrives at a time when grocery prices, rent, and transportation costs remain elevated in every region, and when living wage calculations across Ontario and Atlantic Canada continue to show a significant gap between minimum pay and what workers actually need.
Table of Contents
Ontario’s Minimum Wage Rises to $17.95
Ontario’s general minimum wage increases from $17.60 to $17.95 per hour on October 1, 2026, as confirmed by the Ontario Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development.
The $0.35 adjustment works out to a 2.0% increase, calculated through the province’s annual Consumer Price Index formula that has governed Ontario minimum wage changes for years.
Ontario published the confirmed 2026 figures on April 1, giving employers a full six months to update payroll systems before the rates take effect.
A full-time worker logging 40 hours per week at $17.95 will earn $37,336 in annual gross income, which is $728 more per year than the current rate.
Special category wages are also going up on the same date.
The student minimum wage climbs from $16.60 to $16.90 for workers under 18 who are employed 28 hours or less per week during the school year or who work during a school holiday.
The homeworker rate rises from $19.35 to $19.70, maintaining its position as the highest hourly minimum in the province.
Hunting, fishing, and wilderness guides working fewer than 5 consecutive hours in a day will earn $89.75, while those working 5 or more hours will earn $179.50.
Ontario’s overtime threshold sits at 44 hours per week for most employees, and overtime pay at the new general rate works out to $26.93 per hour.
Workers at federally regulated employers in Ontario continue to receive the $18.15 federal rate because the higher of the two rates applies under the Canada Labour Code.
The Ontario Living Wage Network’s 2025 calculations set the Greater Toronto Area living wage at $27.20 per hour, placing the new $17.95 minimum $9.25 per hour below that threshold, the widest regional gap in the province.
Other areas, including Ottawa at $23.40 and Hamilton at $22.60, also show significant shortfalls. No region in Ontario has a living wage low enough for a full-time minimum wage job to cover basic expenses.
Manitoba Delivers the Largest Percentage Increase
Manitoba’s minimum wage rises from $16.00 to $16.40 per hour on October 1, 2026, as confirmed by Manitoba Labour and Immigration.
The $0.40 increase is a 2.5% adjustment, making Manitoba’s raise the steepest by both percentage and dollar amount among all 5 provinces on this date.
The increase reflects Manitoba’s 2025 inflation rate rounded up to the nearest 5 cents under the Employment Standards Code.
A full-time minimum wage worker in Manitoba will earn $34,112 in annual gross income at the new rate, an $832 annual boost that is also the highest in raw dollar terms among the 5 provinces covered here.
Manitoba does not maintain separate minimum wage categories for students, servers, or trainees.
Overtime in Manitoba applies after 40 hours per week and 8 hours per day, with the new overtime rate working out to $24.60 per hour.
The province’s standard annual adjustment schedule has delivered October 1 rate changes consistently for almost a decade.
The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives estimates the 2025 Winnipeg living wage at $19.77 per hour for a family of four with two full-time earners.
Brandon’s 2025 living wage is estimated at $16.22, and Thompson’s at $17.89. At $16.40, the new minimum wage remains $3.37 below Winnipeg’s 2025 living wage and $1.49 below Thompson’s, although it is $0.18 above the 2025 Brandon benchmark.
Saskatchewan Moves to $15.70
Saskatchewan’s minimum wage increases from $15.35 to $15.70 per hour on October 1, 2026, as announced by Saskatchewan Labour Relations and Workplace Safety.
The $0.35 increase represents a 2.3% adjustment, calculated using an indexation formula that gives equal weight to changes in the provincial CPI and average hourly wages.
A full-time worker earning the new rate will gross $32,656 per year, which is $728 more annually than the current minimum.
Saskatchewan does not operate separate minimum wage tiers for students, servers, or homeworkers, so every covered employee earns the same $15.70 per hour.
Overtime pay at the new floor comes to $23.55 per hour, calculated at 1.5 times the regular rate.
Since 2008, Saskatchewan’s minimum wage has climbed from $8.25 to $15.70, an increase of more than 90% over 18 years.
The province’s annual indexation process requires announcements by June 30 each year, with changes taking effect on October 1.
CCPA Saskatchewan’s latest published city-specific living-wage estimates are based on 2023 costs and put the living wage at $18.50 per hour in Saskatoon and $18.05 in Regina.
Because these benchmarks reflect 2023 living costs rather than current conditions, the actual gap between today’s minimum wage and the true cost of living in these cities may be wider.
Saskatchewan continues to hold one of the lowest minimum wages in the country.
Nova Scotia Completes Its Second Increase of 2026
Nova Scotia’s minimum wage rises from $16.75 to $17.00 per hour on October 1, 2026, completing the second stage of a two-step annual increase announced on December 2, 2025, through Nova Scotia Labour Standards.
The province already moved its rate from $16.50 to $16.75 on April 1, 2026, making Nova Scotia one of two provinces in this group raising its minimum wage twice in a single calendar year.
Prince Edward Island is also implementing two increases in 2026, moving from $16.50 to $17.00 on April 1 and then to $17.30 on October 1.
The combined result of both of Nova Scotia’s 2026 increases adds $0.50 per hour and $1,040 in annual gross pay for a full-time worker compared to the January rate.
The October 1 increase of $0.25 is a 1.5% bump from the April rate.
Nova Scotia’s legislated formula adds 1% on top of the national Consumer Price Index, ensuring the minimum wage grows faster than inflation by design.
Starting with the April 1, 2027, adjustment, the province will return to its standard formula after completing this series of structured catch-up increases.
A full-time worker earning $17.00 per hour will gross $35,360 per year at the October rate.
As of September 19, 2026, Nova Scotia’s general overtime threshold remains 48 hours per week for most employees, and overtime pay at the new rate comes to $25.50 per hour.
The province introduced legislation on September 8 that would reduce the overtime threshold to 44 hours, but the proposed change should not be treated as effective until the legislation is enacted and brought into force.
The CCPA’s 2025 report places the Nova Scotia provincial weighted average living wage at $27.60 per hour, with Halifax at $29.40 per hour, one of the highest in all of Atlantic Canada.
That leaves a gap of $12.40 per hour between the new $17.00 minimum and the Halifax living wage, underscoring the province’s reliance on a low-wage labour market that the CCPA says affects roughly half of all workers in the province.
PEI Holds Its Position as Atlantic Canada’s Highest
Prince Edward Island’s minimum wage increases from $17.00 to $17.30 per hour on October 1, 2026, maintaining the province’s standing as the highest minimum wage jurisdiction in Atlantic Canada, as confirmed by PEI Employment Standards.
The $0.30 increase is a 1.8% adjustment that continues a structured series of raises reaching back through 2025.
PEI’s cumulative 2026 increase from $16.50 to $17.30 adds $0.80 per hour over the course of the year, the largest combined annual lift among the 5 provinces on this list.
A full-time worker at the new rate will earn $35,984 in annual gross income, which is $624 more per year than the current $17.00 floor.
PEI has already confirmed a further increase to $17.60 per hour on April 1, 2027, giving both workers and employers clear visibility into the next scheduled change.
The province’s standard work week was reduced from 48 hours to 44 hours under the new Employment Standards Act that took effect on June 30, 2026.
Overtime now applies after 44 hours and is paid at 1.5 times the regular rate, which works out to $25.95 per hour at the new minimum.
PEI does not maintain separate categories for students, servers, or trainees.
The CCPA’s 2025 living wage for PEI is $22.77 per hour as a provincial average, with Charlottetown at $23.30 and Summerside at $22.20.
Notably, PEI’s living wage held flat between 2024 and 2025 thanks to a combination of expanded $10-a-day child care access, a new provincial child benefit, and lower transportation costs.
At $17.30, the new minimum wage remains $5.47 below PEI’s 2025 provincial weighted-average living wage of $22.77.
Minimum Wage Schedule for All Canadian Provinces and Territories
The following table shows the current minimum wage, the next confirmed increase, and the next scheduled adjustment date for every jurisdiction in Canada, including the 5 provinces raising rates on October 1, 2026.
Jurisdiction Current Rate Next Raise Next Scheduled Adjustment / Announced Increase Nunavut $20.17 TBD (CPI-indexed) September 1, 2027 Yukon $18.51 TBD (CPI-indexed) April 1, 2027 British Columbia $18.25 TBD (CPI-indexed) June 1, 2027 Federal $18.15 TBD (CPI-indexed) April 1, 2027 Ontario $17.60 → $17.95 $17.95 October 1, 2026 Prince Edward Island $17.00 → $17.30 $17.30 October 1, 2026 Northwest Territories $17.20 TBD (CPI-indexed) September 1, 2027 Nova Scotia $16.75 → $17.00 $17.00 October 1, 2026 Quebec $16.60 TBD TBD (typically May 1) Manitoba $16.00 → $16.40 $16.40 October 1, 2026 Newfoundland and Labrador $16.35 TBD (CPI-indexed) April 1, 2027 New Brunswick $15.90 TBD (CPI-indexed) April 1, 2027 Saskatchewan $15.35 → $15.70 $15.70 October 1, 2026 Alberta $15.00 No increase announced N/A PEI has a further confirmed increase to $17.60 per hour scheduled for April 1, 2027. Nova Scotia returns to its annual legislated formula starting with the April 1, 2027, adjustment.
Alberta has not raised its minimum wage since October 1, 2018, leaving it at the lowest provincial rate in the country.
All 5 October 2026 provincial rates remain below the federal minimum wage of $18.15 per hour, meaning federally regulated workers in these provinces continue to receive the federal rate.
British Columbia holds the highest provincial rate at $18.25 per hour after its June 1, 2026, increase, and it is the only province currently above the federal floor.
The October 1 minimum wage increases across these 5 provinces collectively put more money into paycheques at a time when essential costs remain elevated.
Manitoba’s $832 annual boost for full-time workers is the largest in absolute terms, while Ontario’s $17.95 rate positions the province as the second-highest provincial minimum wage after British Columbia’s $18.25.
Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island are the two provinces in this group implementing two minimum-wage increases during 2026, with PEI’s combined $0.80 per hour lift over the calendar year exceeding Nova Scotia’s combined $0.50.
PEI’s approach of scheduling increases across fixed dates through April 2027 gives workers and businesses in the province the longest forward visibility of any Atlantic province.
Saskatchewan’s rate, while growing 2.3% on October 1, still trails every other provincial minimum wage outside Alberta.
Using the most recent 2025 living-wage benchmarks available for Ontario, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, and PEI, significant gaps remain in major centres, ranging from $3.37 per hour in Winnipeg to $12.40 per hour in Halifax.
Workers should verify the applicable rate for their occupation, confirm whether any special wage category applies to their job, and review their first paycheque after October 1 to ensure the updated minimum wage has been applied.
Newcomers on work permits in any of these provinces are entitled to the same minimum wage protections as Canadian citizens and permanent residents under both federal and provincial employment standards.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Which Canadian province has the largest gap between its minimum wage and its living wage after October 1, 2026?
Nova Scotia has the widest gap among the 5 provinces raising wages on October 1, 2026. The new $17.00 per hour minimum wage sits $12.40 below the Halifax living wage of $29.40 per hour, as calculated by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives in its 2025 report. The Nova Scotia provincial weighted average living wage is $27.60 per hour, meaning the gap exceeds $10 per hour even outside Halifax. Ontario’s Greater Toronto Area also shows a significant gap of $9.25 per hour between the new $17.95 minimum and the $27.20 living wage, but Nova Scotia’s is the steepest among the group.
Does the October 1, 2026 minimum wage increase apply to workers on temporary work permits in Canada?
Yes, every provincial minimum wage in Canada applies equally to workers regardless of their immigration status, including those on temporary work permits, open work permits, and employer-specific work permits. Provincial employment standards protect all workers in the jurisdiction where the work is performed, and employers cannot pay less than the applicable minimum wage based on a worker’s citizenship or immigration status. Workers in federally regulated industries receive the $18.15 federal minimum wage or the provincial rate, whichever is higher.
Why does Alberta not appear on the October 1, 2026, minimum wage increase list?
Alberta has not adjusted its general minimum wage since October 1, 2018, when it was set at $15.00 per hour. Unlike the 5 provinces raising rates on October 1, 2026, Alberta does not use an automatic inflation-indexed formula to adjust its minimum wage annually. The $15.00 rate is currently the lowest provincial minimum wage in Canada, sitting $2.95 below Ontario’s new $17.95 and $3.25 below British Columbia’s $18.25. The Alberta government has not announced any plans for a future increase.
Can an employer pay a worker the old minimum wage rate for hours worked on October 1, 2026?
No, all 5 provinces require employers to apply the new rate to every hour worked on and after October 1, 2026. If a pay period straddles the October 1 effective date, hours worked before October 1 can be paid at the previous rate, but hours worked on October 1 and beyond must be paid at the new rate. Employers who fail to update payroll on time remain liable for the wage shortfall, and workers can file complaints with their provincial employment standards authority to recover unpaid amounts.
How are the October 1, 2026 minimum wage increases calculated in each province?
Each of the 5 provinces uses a slightly different approach. Ontario ties its increase to the Ontario Consumer Price Index from the previous year, rounding the final rate to the nearest 5 cents. Manitoba indexes to the Manitoba CPI, also rounding to the nearest 5 cents. Saskatchewan uses a formula that gives equal weight to changes in the provincial CPI and average hourly wages. Nova Scotia uses the national CPI plus an additional 1%, though the October 2026 increase is the second half of a pre-set two-step raise rather than a fresh formula calculation. Prince Edward Island does not currently use a legislated indexation formula and instead sets rates through its Employment Standards Board recommendations.
Fact-Checked: The October 1, 2026 minimum wage rates, effective dates, percentage increases, overtime rules, living wage comparisons, and all-province schedule referenced in this article have been verified against official federal and provincial government sources and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives’ published living wage reports as of September 2026.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, employment, payroll, or financial advice. Minimum wage and overtime rules may vary depending on occupation, industry, employment status, exemptions, and whether a workplace is provincially or federally regulated. Workers and employers should consult the applicable provincial employment standards authority or the federal Labour Program for guidance specific to their circumstances.
Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.
You may also like: New OAS Payments Coming On September 25, 2026
New Minimum Wage In Canada’s 5 Provinces Effective October 1
New OAS Payment Increase Coming In October 2026
New Canada Benefit Payments Still Coming In September 2026
- New Ontario List Of In-Demand Careers For 2026-2027
Immigration News Canada has compiled an updated 2026-2027 list of Ontario in-demand careers using the province’s official Explore In-Demand Careers database, following the latest investment in 40,000 new postsecondary seats for high-demand fields.
Unlike rankings assembled by recruitment websites or third-party job boards, the occupations identified below are drawn from Ontario government labour market data on wages, job openings, education requirements and regional employment trends.
Ontario’s career tool is a dynamic, continuously maintained resource rather than a single annual ranking, which means the occupations it identifies reflect current provincial labour market conditions.
The list has taken on added significance after the provincial government announced 40,000 additional funded seats at publicly assisted colleges and universities specifically for programs connected to high-demand fields.
These new seats, available for student enrollment as early as fall 2026, are being directed toward science, technology, engineering and mathematics; health care; education; and skilled trades.
The investment forms part of a broader $1.7-billion commitment to fund more than 70,000 additional postsecondary seats through Ontario’s Priority Growth Fund.
For students choosing a program, workers weighing a career change and newcomers evaluating long-term opportunities in Ontario, the province’s own in-demand career data offers a concrete starting point for identifying occupations with stronger employment prospects heading into 2027.
Table of Contents
Ontario’s 40,000 New Postsecondary Seats And What They Cover
On September 10, 2026, Ontario announced the allocation of 40,000 new funded seats at publicly assisted colleges and universities across the province.
Minister of Colleges, Universities, Research Excellence and Security Nolan Quinn said the investment supports the largest seat expansion in Ontario in more than a decade.
The 40,000 seats join an earlier allocation of 30,000 seats announced in May 2026, bringing the total expansion under the Priority Growth Fund to more than 70,000 new postsecondary spaces.
Colleges and universities worked with their local communities and industries to identify programs that would prepare students for occupations facing current and projected labour shortages.
The province evaluated proposals based on institutional capacity, local industry needs and student demand to ensure each allocation targets workforce gaps that employers are reporting right now.
How The 70,000+ Seats Are Distributed By Sector
The following breakdown reflects the entire $1.7-billion expansion of more than 70,000 seats, not the 40,000 seats announced on September 10 alone.
Sector Approximate Seats Key Programs Identified STEM 40,200 Engineering, technology, mathematics, science, AI Health Care 16,100 Nursing, nuclear medicine, physician-assistant training Education 7,900 Teacher education, early childhood education Skilled Trades 3,800 Carpentry, electrical, plumbing, industrial trades Other Labour-Market Programs 3,000 Determined by regional employer demand Ontario has not yet published a complete program-by-program or institution-by-institution list for the newly allocated 40,000 seats, and individual college and university allocations are still being released.
McMaster University received $90 million for 2,769 new seats, and its president indicated that most are expected to go toward health care and STEM, with nuclear medicine, nuclear energy and physician-assistant training identified as potential programs.
Ontario Tech University and Durham College received $79 million for 2,861 combined seats across STEM, health, trades and education programs.
Additional institutional allocations are expected in the coming weeks, which means this article will be updated as those announcements are confirmed.
STEM Careers In Demand Across Ontario
STEM fields account for the largest share of Ontario’s seat expansion at roughly 40,200 spaces, and the province has specifically named artificial intelligence as a priority area within this allocation.
The official government career database includes several technology occupations, including information systems specialists and cybersecurity specialists.
However, labour market conditions vary significantly by occupation within the STEM category.
Federal Job Bank projections for 2025-2027 currently rate information systems specialists as Moderate, cybersecurity specialists as limited, and software engineers and designers as Very limited across Ontario.
Ontario’s postsecondary investment nevertheless identifies STEM and artificial intelligence as strategic areas for training and long-term workforce development, which is why the province is directing the largest share of new seats toward these fields.
Civil, mechanical and electrical engineers remain part of in-demand career data, supported by infrastructure, transit expansion and clean energy projects that require specialized technical expertise.
The federal government has retained STEM as an Express Entry category for 2026, including cybersecurity specialists and several engineering occupations.
Canada’s National Artificial Intelligence Strategy has further elevated the importance of AI-related roles, including machine learning engineers, data scientists and AI research professionals.
Ontario In-Demand And Priority STEM Occupations
- Civil engineers
- Electrical and electronics engineers
- Mechanical engineers
- Industrial and manufacturing engineers
- Civil engineering technologists and technicians
- Electrical and electronics engineering technologists
- Information systems specialists
- Business systems specialists
- Data scientists
- Database analysts and administrators
- Cybersecurity specialists
- Computer systems developers and programmers
- Computer network and web technicians
- Chemists
- Biologists
- Mathematicians, statisticians and actuaries
- Urban and land-use planners
Health Care Careers Driving Ontario’s Labour Demand
Health care receives the second-largest share of Ontario’s seat expansion with approximately 16,100 new spaces, and nursing is the occupation the province has specifically named within this allocation.
The province’s official career tool lists registered nurses and registered psychiatric nurses with a median annual salary of approximately $87,400 and a Job Bank outlook rated as Very Good through 2027.
Registered practical nurses are also listed among Ontario’s in-demand careers at a median salary of approximately $64,500, filling essential roles in long-term care facilities, hospitals and community health settings across the province.
Paramedical and related technical occupations carry a median salary of approximately $87,700 according to the province’s career data.
Social workers appear on the provincial in-demand list at a median salary of around $80,400, supporting mental health services, child welfare and community support programs that continue to face staffing pressures driven by population growth and an aging demographic.
Home support workers and personal support workers round out the health care demand picture, with Ontario relying heavily on these roles to deliver care in home and community settings where hospital capacity is constrained.
For newcomers considering permanent residence pathways through Ontario, health care occupations received targeted invitations from the Ontario Immigrant Nominee Program during 2026 before the program redesign took effect.
Ontario In-Demand And Priority Health Care Occupations
- Registered nurses and registered psychiatric nurses
- Registered practical nurses
- Nurse aides and patient service associates
- Personal support workers
- Home support workers and caregivers
- Paramedics
- Pharmacists
- Pharmacy technicians
- Medical laboratory technologists
- Medical laboratory assistants
- Medical sonographers
- Respiratory therapists
- Physiotherapists
- Dental hygienists
- Dental assistants
- Family physicians
- Specialist physicians
- Social workers
- Social and community service workers
Education Careers Ontario Is Expanding
Ontario has directed approximately 7,900 new postsecondary seats toward education programs, principally those producing teachers and educators to address classroom staffing shortages.
Secondary school teachers carry strong employment prospects in Ontario, with a median salary of approximately $100,000 according to the province’s career data.
Early childhood educators have appeared in multiple OINP draws during 2026, reflecting the province’s ongoing need for qualified professionals in licensed childcare centres and early learning programs.
The federal government has also retained education occupations as an Express Entry category for 2026, covering secondary and elementary teachers, early childhood educators and assistants, instructors of persons with disabilities and teacher assistants.
Ontario’s Learn and Stay Grant program provides additional financial support for students who commit to working in underserved regions of the province after graduating from eligible education, nursing or paramedic programs.
Ontario In-Demand And Priority Education Occupations
- Secondary school teachers
- Elementary and kindergarten teachers
- Early childhood educators and assistants
- Educational assistants
- Instructors of persons with disabilities
- University professors and lecturers
- College and vocational instructors
- Postsecondary teaching and research assistants
- Educational counsellors
- Career development practitioners and counsellors
Skilled Trades Ontario Continues To Prioritize
Approximately 3,800 seats in Ontario’s expansion are allocated to skilled trades programs, although the province has not released a complete trade-by-trade breakdown of how those seats will be distributed.
Ontario’s career database lists carpenters, electricians, millwrights, welders, plumbers, heavy-equipment operators and automotive service technicians among its in-demand occupations.
Plumbers, welders, heavy-equipment operators and industrial mechanics all appear on federal and provincial lists of priority trade occupations that are eligible for targeted immigration draws.
The province has invested in apprenticeship programs and Red Seal certification pathways to train more domestic workers for trade occupations where retirements and an aging workforce have created persistent shortages.
The province’s investment in EV battery plants, nuclear energy facilities and green technology manufacturing in regions such as Windsor, Durham and Darlington is driving specific demand for millwrights, instrumentation technicians and power systems electricians.
Ontario In-Demand And Priority Skilled Trade Occupations
- Construction millwrights and industrial mechanics
- Electricians
- Industrial electricians
- Plumbers
- Carpenters
- Welders
- Heating, refrigeration and air-conditioning mechanics
- Heavy-equipment operators
- Automotive service technicians
- Truck and bus mechanics
- Machinists
- Tool and die makers
- Industrial instrumentation technicians
- Sheet-metal workers
- Steamfitters and pipefitters
- Sprinkler and fire-protection installers
- Crane operators
- Construction estimators
- Construction inspectors
Ontario In-Demand Careers With Salaries And Outlooks
The figures below use Ontario government median salary data and federal Job Bank wage information for 2025-2027 across Ontario.
Actual compensation varies by occupation, experience, region and employer.
Career Sector Approx. Annual Pay Job Bank Outlook Registered Nurses Health Care $87,400 Very Good Information Systems Specialists STEM $97,800 Moderate Paramedical Occupations Health Care $87,700 Good Registered Practical Nurses Health Care $64,500 Good Social Workers Health Care / Social Services $80,400 Moderate Software Engineers / Designers STEM $100,000+ Very Limited Cybersecurity Specialists STEM $107,000 Limited Secondary School Teachers Education $100,000 Moderate Early Childhood Educators Education $45,800 Good Electricians Skilled Trades $66,600 Moderate Carpenters Skilled Trades $66,600 Moderate Home Support Workers Health Care $45,800 Good Workers in the Greater Toronto Area and Ottawa typically command higher wages than those in smaller centres, though the cost of living in those cities also runs significantly higher.
A career appearing in Ontario’s in-demand database does not always mean the federal Job Bank rates its near-term outlook as strong, because the two sources measure different things and cover different timeframes.
Why Ontario’s Investment Matters For Career Planning
Ontario’s decision to direct billions of dollars and tens of thousands of postsecondary seats toward specific sectors sends a clear signal about where the province expects employment growth over the next several years.
Students deciding what to study now have a government-backed indication of which fields Ontario considers important enough to fund at scale.
The announcement also arrives at a time when Ontario’s postsecondary sector is recovering from the financial impact of federal international student visa caps that reduced enrolment and forced program cuts at multiple institutions.
The $6.4-billion postsecondary funding package, which includes changes to the domestic tuition framework beginning fall 2026, represents the province’s effort to stabilize institutions while reorienting programming toward labour market demands.
Employers across Ontario have consistently reported that labour shortages remain a barrier to growth, particularly in health care, construction, technology and skilled trades.
The Ontario Chamber of Commerce has described skills shortages as one of the most pressing issues its member businesses face daily.
What This Means For Newcomers And Immigration Candidates
Ontario’s in-demand career list overlaps significantly with the occupations targeted by both federal and provincial immigration programs.
The redesigned OINP now operates the Ontario Workforce Priority Stream, with pathways covering job offers across all TEER categories as well as eligible self-employed physicians.
Ontario retains flexibility to target particular occupations or labour market needs when issuing invitations, but appearing in the province’s Explore In-Demand Careers database does not by itself guarantee an invitation or provide an automatic immigration advantage.
Before the OINP redesign took effect, Ontario issued targeted invitations during 2026 for health care and early childhood education, skilled trades, physicians, mining-related occupations and other priority groups, and the province’s 2026 nomination allocation of 14,119 spots represents a 31% increase over 2025.
At the federal level, Express Entry’s category-based selection includes health care, STEM, trades, education and transport occupations through dedicated categories that can offer lower CRS cutoffs than general rounds.
For international students who are subject to the federal PGWP field-of-study requirement, many programs in health care and social services, STEM, education, trades and other shortage-linked fields have eligible CIP codes.
Eligibility depends on the specific program and CIP code, and graduates of bachelor’s, master’s and doctoral degree programs are exempt from the field-of-study requirement.
The PGWP-to-permanent-residence pathway may align graduates with occupation-based immigration pathways after they gain qualifying work experience.
Newcomers who are already working in Ontario should check whether their current occupation appears on the province’s in-demand list, as alignment with these occupations can strengthen federal Express Entry profiles when occupation-specific draws are held.
Ontario is not speculating about which careers will matter over the next several years.
The province has committed $1.7 billion to expanding postsecondary capacity in the specific sectors where its own labour market data shows persistent demand, and it has backed that commitment with more than 70,000 funded seats.
When a government directs that level of funding toward STEM, health care, education and skilled trades, it communicates something concrete about where the economy is heading and where career opportunities will be strongest.
For anyone choosing a field of study, evaluating a career change or planning an immigration strategy around Ontario’s labour market, the province’s own data removes much of the guesswork that typically surrounds career planning.
The occupations listed in this article are not projections or opinions.
They are careers that Ontario has identified as in demand, measured against real employment data and now supported by the largest postsecondary seat expansion the province has undertaken in more than a decade.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Can I enroll in one of the 40,000 new seats right now?
Ontario has confirmed that some seats will be available for student enrollment as early as fall 2026, but individual program availability depends on each institution’s allocation, which the province is still announcing on a rolling basis.
Students should contact their preferred college or university directly to ask whether newly funded spaces have been confirmed for specific programs.
Keep in mind that admission requirements, prerequisite courses and application deadlines vary by institution and program type.Do the 40,200 STEM seats all come from the September 10 announcement?
No, the sector-level figures of 40,200 STEM seats, 16,100 health care seats and so on refer to the entire 70,000+ seat expansion under Ontario’s $1.7-billion Priority Growth Fund.
The 40,000 seats announced on September 10, 2026, are the second allocation within that broader investment.
The first 30,000 seats were announced in May 2026, and individual institutional breakdowns within the new 40,000 are still being released.Will studying in one of these in-demand fields help with permanent residence in Canada?
Studying in a field aligned with Ontario’s in-demand sectors can strengthen your permanent residence prospects through multiple pathways.
Graduates with work experience in targeted occupations may qualify for provincial nomination through the OINP, and those same occupations are often included in the federal Express Entry category-based selection.
For international students subject to the PGWP field-of-study requirement, many in-demand programs have eligible CIP codes, though graduates of bachelor’s, master’s and doctoral degree programs are exempt from this requirement.Are these careers only relevant for domestic students, or do they apply to international students too?
Ontario’s in-demand career data applies to the broader labour market regardless of a worker’s immigration status.
International students benefit from choosing programs in these fields because Ontario directed 96% of its 2026 Provincial Attestation Letter allocations to publicly assisted colleges and universities and prioritized programs connected to high-demand sectors.
Graduating from a program in one of these fields may align graduates with occupation-based immigration pathways after they gain qualifying work experience.How often does Ontario update its list of in-demand careers?
Ontario’s Explore In-Demand Careers database is maintained as a living resource that reflects current labour market conditions, including wages, job posting volumes, education pathways and regional demand patterns.
The data draws from the National Occupational Classification system and provincial labour market forecasts that are reviewed on a regular cycle.
Specific occupations can be added or removed as employment conditions shift, which is why checking the province’s official career tool directly provides the most current information.Fact-Checked: All seat allocation figures, sector breakdowns, salary data, institutional funding amounts, Job Bank outlooks and government quotes in this article have been verified against the official Ontario Newsroom release dated September 10, 2026, the Ontario government’s Explore In-Demand Careers database, the federal Job Bank’s 2025-2027 occupation outlook reports, the 2026 OINP updates page, and reporting from The Globe and Mail and Ontario Construction News as of September 18, 2026.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute career counselling, educational advice or immigration advice.
Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.
You may also like: New OAS Payments Coming On September 25, 2026
New Minimum Wage In Canada’s 5 Provinces Effective October 1
New OAS Payment Increase Coming In October 2026
New Canada Benefit Payments Still Coming In September 2026
- New BC PWD Payment To Be Sent On September 23
British Columbia’s next Persons With Disability assistance (PWD payment) is confirmed for Wednesday, September 23, 2026.
This deposit covers October 2026 living expenses and will land in bank accounts for recipients enrolled in direct deposit.
A single person holding the Persons with Disabilities designation can receive up to $1,483.50 per month, combining the $983.50 support allowance with the maximum $500 shelter allowance.
The September 23 date falls on the fourth Wednesday of the month, consistent with the provincial payment schedule that typically issues income and disability assistance on the third or fourth Wednesday.
Recipients who collect their payments by cheque can pick up the cheque at their local Ministry of Social Development and Poverty Reduction office or wait for it to arrive by mail.
The previous PWD deposit arrived on August 26 and covered September 2026 expenses.
British Columbia issues disability assistance payments one month in advance, which means the money received in September is budgeted for October rent, utilities, food, and personal needs.
This advance payment structure gives recipients time to cover the first of the month’s housing costs without waiting for a deposit that lands after bills are already due.
Table of Contents
PWD Support Allowance Rates By Family Composition
The support allowance portion of the PWD payment varies based on how many people are in the family unit and whether one or both adults hold the PWD designation.
These rates have been in effect since December 1, 2025, when the province implemented changes that included the removal of the spousal cap for couples where both partners have the PWD designation.
A single person in Category A receives $983.50 per month in support.
A couple where one partner holds the PWD designation and the other is under 65 receives $1,543.50 in combined support for a two-person unit.
Where both adults in a couple hold the PWD designation, the support allowance jumps to $1,967.00 for a two-person unit under Category B.
Single-parent families where the parent carries the designation receive $1,133.50 under Category C, regardless of family size.
A couple where one adult is designated PWD and the other is 65 or older receives $1,843.50 under Category D for a two-person unit.
Support amounts for families with three or more members are higher under Categories A, B, and D, reaching $1,643.50, $2,067.00, and $1,943.50, respectively, for units of three through seven.
Maximum Shelter Allowance By Family Size
The shelter allowance covers rent, mortgage payments, property taxes, home insurance, and utility costs.
Recipients receive the lesser of their actual shelter costs or the maximum amount for their family unit size, with a guaranteed minimum even if actual shelter costs fall below it.
A single person can receive between $75 and $500 per month for shelter, depending on actual housing costs.
Two-person family units qualify for up to $695, while three-person units can receive up to $790.
Families of four can collect a maximum of $840, and the ceiling rises by $50 for each additional family member after that.
For a single PWD recipient paying $500 or more in monthly rent, the maximum combined payment works out to $1,483.50, which is the figure most commonly cited when discussing individual BC disability assistance rates.
Average rents across British Columbia’s major cities regularly exceed $1,500 per month for a one-bedroom apartment, leaving a substantial gap between the shelter allowance and actual housing costs.
The shelter calculation can also include eligible utility costs such as heating, cooking fuel, water, hydro, qualifying garbage disposal, and the rental cost of one basic residential single-line telephone.
Transportation Supplement And BC Bus Pass
Every recipient with the PWD designation also receives a $52 monthly transportation supplement on top of the support and shelter allowances.
This supplement gives recipients a choice between receiving a BC Transit or TransLink annual bus pass or taking the $52 as a direct cash addition to their monthly deposit.
Recipients who do not live near transit routes or prefer to use the funds for gas, taxi costs, or HandyDART fares often choose the cash option.
Switching between the bus pass and cash payment is permitted at any time by notifying the Ministry before the 5th of the month.
When the transportation supplement is included, a single PWD recipient’s total monthly provincial support reaches $1,535.50.
Annual Earnings Exemption For Working Recipients
British Columbia uses an Annual Earnings Exemption system that allows PWD recipients to earn employment income without losing benefits.
A single person with the PWD designation can earn up to $16,200 per calendar year before their disability assistance is reduced.
Families where both adults hold the PWD designation can earn up to $32,400 in qualifying income during the 2026 calendar year before disability assistance is reduced.
The province raised the exemption for couples where only one partner has the PWD designation from $19,440 to $23,400 effective January 1, 2026, giving these families significantly more room to supplement their disability payments through employment.
Once a recipient’s earnings exceed the annual threshold, every additional dollar is deducted dollar-for-dollar from their monthly payment.
The exemption resets each January 1, and recipients can distribute their earnings across the year however they choose.
Earning the full $16,200 in a single month has the same effect on benefits as spreading it across twelve months, which offers flexibility for recipients whose work is seasonal or project-based.
Unlike Ontario’s ODSP program, which uses a monthly income exemption of $1,000 with a 75% clawback above that level, British Columbia’s annual structure allows recipients to plan employment income over a longer horizon.
How The Federal Canada Disability Benefit Interacts With PWD
The Canada Disability Benefit provides an additional layer of financial support for PWD recipients who also hold a valid Disability Tax Credit certificate from the CRA.
British Columbia has confirmed that CDB payments are fully exempt from PWD income calculations.
This exemption means a qualifying recipient can collect both their full provincial PWD payment and the federal benefit without one reducing the other.
The CDB currently pays a maximum of $204.20 per month for the 2026-27 benefit year, following a 2.1% inflation adjustment that took effect with the July 2026 deposit.
A single PWD recipient receiving the maximum provincial disability assistance and maximum CDB can receive $1,687.70 per month before the transportation supplement.
If the recipient chooses the $52 cash transportation option instead of the bus pass, total monthly cash support can reach $1,739.70.
Service Canada administers the CDB separately from provincial programs, and payments arrive on the third Thursday of each month rather than on the provincial schedule.
The next CDB payment is scheduled for October 15, 2026, less than a month after the September 23 PWD deposit.
A one-time $150 supplemental CDB payment is also being issued to help offset costs associated with obtaining the Disability Tax Credit.
On September 17, 2026, the federal government began issuing the payment automatically to eligible people who received a CDB payment between July 2025 and June 2026.
People who became eligible for a CDB payment beginning in July 2026, along with people approved under a new DTC certificate, are expected to receive the supplemental payment in winter 2027.
Not every province treats the CDB the same way as British Columbia does.
Alberta applies a dollar-for-dollar clawback of CDB payments from AISH and the new Alberta Disability Assistance Program, which means Alberta recipients see no net income increase from the federal benefit.
Ontario has exempted the CDB from ODSP calculations, matching British Columbia’s approach.
December 2025 Rate Changes Still In Effect
The most significant recent update to BC’s disability assistance rates took effect on December 1, 2025.
The province removed the spousal cap that previously limited combined support for couples where both partners held the PWD designation.
Under the old rules, a couple where both adults were designated PWD did not receive the full equivalent of two individual payments.
The updated Category B rates now provide $1,967.00 in support for a two-person couple, reflecting the province’s commitment to treating each designated individual’s needs independently.
Several shelter allowance maximums also increased effective December 1, 2025, particularly for larger family units.
The maximum shelter for a single person rose to $500, and families of three or more saw incremental increases across the board.
These changes are reflected in the official disability assistance rate table published by the Ministry.
How To Verify Your Payment And Manage Your Account
Recipients can check their PWD payment details, track their Annual Earnings Exemption usage, and update banking information through the My Self Serve online portal.
The Ministry phone line at 1-866-866-0800 is available toll-free for recipients who prefer to speak with someone directly.
Local Service BC offices also provide in-person help with payment inquiries, status changes, and documentation.
If the deposit does not appear on September 23, posting times can vary by financial institution.
Recipients can check My Self Serve for their payment information and contact the Ministry if the issue persists.
Updating direct deposit information before the payment date is recommended for anyone who has recently switched banks or opened a new account.
PWD Eligibility Requirements
Qualifying for the PWD designation requires meeting three connected criteria related to the nature, severity, and impact of the disability.
The impairment must be a severe physical or mental condition that, in the opinion of a medical practitioner or nurse practitioner, will likely continue for at least two years.
A prescribed professional must confirm that the impairment directly and significantly restricts the person’s ability to perform daily living activities, either continuously or periodically for extended periods.
The restrictions must be significant enough that the person requires help from another individual, an assistance animal, or an assistive device to manage those activities.
Applicants must be at least 18 years of age to receive disability assistance payments, though designation can be confirmed before turning 18, with payments beginning in the month of the 18th birthday.
Financial eligibility also applies, with an asset limit of $100,000 for a single individual or $200,000 for a couple where both adults hold the designation.
Exempt assets include the primary residence, one vehicle, an RDSP, clothing, business tools, prepaid funeral costs, GST credit amounts, and Canada Child Benefit funds.
The application process typically begins with an application for general income assistance, at which point the applicant indicates their intent to seek the PWD designation.
Registration for a BCeID is required to use the My Self Serve portal, which handles most of the communication and documentation exchange with the Ministry.
Remaining 2026 PWD Payment Dates
The final three payments of the 2026 calendar year follow the same Wednesday pattern that has held throughout the year.
- October 21, 2026 covers November 2026 expenses.
- November 18, 2026 covers December 2026 expenses.
- December 16, 2026 covers January 2027 expenses and arrives earlier than usual to accommodate the holiday season.
The December payment date is the only one during the year that shifts from the typical third-or-fourth Wednesday pattern, landing on the third Wednesday to avoid conflicts with Christmas and Boxing Day.
These dates apply equally to PWD recipients and general income assistance recipients, as both programs share the same provincial payment calendar.
Recipients planning their budgets around the remaining federal benefit deposit dates should note that CPP and OAS payments are scheduled for September 25, October 28, November 26, and December 22, while CDB payments follow their own third-Thursday schedule through Service Canada.
The gap between the September 23 PWD deposit and the October 21 deposit is exactly four weeks, making it one of the shorter intervals on the 2026 schedule.
Some stretches during the year span five full weeks between deposits, which can create budgeting pressure for recipients who allocate funds on a monthly basis.
Setting aside rent and essential expenses immediately upon receiving each deposit is one of the most effective strategies for managing the uneven spacing between payments, particularly during the higher cost-of-living months heading into winter.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Can I receive both BC PWD payments and the federal Canada Disability Benefit at the same time without one reducing the other?
Yes, British Columbia has confirmed that the Canada Disability Benefit is fully exempt from PWD income calculations. A single recipient collecting the maximum PWD base amount of $1,483.50 and the maximum CDB amount of $204.20 would receive $1,687.70 per month before the transportation supplement. If the recipient takes the $52 cash transportation option, total monthly cash support reaches $1,739.70. The CDB is administered by Service Canada on a separate payment schedule and requires a valid Disability Tax Credit certificate. Holding a DTC certificate alone does not automatically enrol you in the CDB, as you must submit a separate application through Service Canada.
What happens to my BC PWD payment if I earn employment income during the year?
British Columbia uses an Annual Earnings Exemption that lets you earn up to $16,200 per calendar year without any reduction to your disability assistance. You can earn that amount in one month or spread it across the year. Once your employment income exceeds the threshold, each additional dollar is deducted dollar-for-dollar from your monthly payment. For couples where only one partner holds the PWD designation, the combined exemption increased to $23,400 effective January 1, 2026. Tracking your annual total through the My Self Serve portal helps avoid unexpected reductions later in the year.
Does the September 23 payment cover September or October living expenses?
The September 23 deposit covers October 2026 expenses. British Columbia issues disability assistance payments one month in advance, so each deposit is intended for the following month’s rent, utilities, food, and personal needs. The August 26 deposit that recipients already received covered September 2026 expenses. This advance structure means the December 16 payment, the last of the year, will cover January 2027 costs.
What assets can I own without losing eligibility for BC PWD disability assistance?
The general asset limit is $100,000 for a single individual and $200,000 for a couple where both adults hold the PWD designation. However, several categories of assets are fully exempt from this calculation. Your primary home, one vehicle, an RDSP, clothing, business tools, prepaid funeral costs, GST/HST credit amounts, Canada Child Benefit funds, and RESP savings are all excluded. Non-exempt assets such as cash savings, secondary properties, and investments count toward the threshold. Exceeding the limit can affect your eligibility for ongoing payments.
Why is the December 2026 PWD payment issued earlier than the other months?
The December 16, 2026, deposit lands on the third Wednesday of the month instead of the usual third- or fourth-Wednesday pattern because the province adjusts the schedule to avoid Christmas and Boxing Day. This is standard practice every year for both disability assistance and general income assistance recipients. The earlier deposit covers January 2027 expenses, giving recipients access to funds before the holiday period when many financial institutions have reduced hours or closures.
Fact-checked: Payment dates, benefit rates, shelter allowances, earnings exemption thresholds, and CDB interaction rules are verified against official BC government publications, including the Disability Assistance Rate Table (last updated July 7, 2026), the Annual Earnings Exemption page, the Employment and Assistance for Persons with Disabilities Regulation, the provincial income assistance payment dates page, the Transportation Supplement policy page, Canada.ca’s CDB payment amounts page, the September 2026 CDB supplemental payment announcement, and the Government of Canada benefits payment calendar, all current as of September 17, 2026.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or professional advice. Benefit amounts, eligibility criteria, and payment dates are subject to change. Readers should consult official government sources or a qualified professional for guidance specific to their individual circumstances.
Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.
You may also like: New OAS Payments Coming On September 25, 2026
New Minimum Wage In Canada’s 5 Provinces Effective October 1
New OAS Payment Increase Coming In October 2026
New Canada Benefit Payments Still Coming In September 2026
- Canada Visa Refusal Overturned After Officer Ignored Key Evidence
A new Federal Court of Canada ruling has set aside a Canadian visa refusal after finding that the immigration officer failed to meaningfully address significant financial and family ties, evidence that directly contradicted the stated reasons for refusing the application.
In Kumar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1138, Justice Azmudeh of the Federal Court held on September 10, 2026, that the refusal of a temporary resident visa application filed by Indian citizen Seema Kumar was unreasonable because the officer’s reasons did not engage with the contradictory evidence that was plainly part of the record.
The evidence before the officer included statements covering eleven bank accounts with ongoing deposits totalling ₹5,534,658.16, which Kumar estimated at more than CAD $90,000, along with documentation of business income, rental income, and financial support from the applicant’s sister in Canada whose bank assets alone reportedly exceeded CAD $215,000.
Despite this record, the officer’s notes cited concerns about the applicant’s financial circumstances, the source and sufficiency of her funds, whether the purpose of the visit was consistent with a temporary stay, and a lack of significant family ties outside Canada.
The Court did not order Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) to issue a visa. Instead, it set aside the refusal and returned the application for reconsideration by a different officer.
Table of Contents
What Canada Visa Seema Kumar Applied For?
Kumar, a citizen of India, applied for a temporary resident visa to visit her sister in Montreal for approximately one month.
Part of the purpose of the trip was to attend her nephew’s baptism, a specific, time-limited family event.
The application was refused on December 19, 2024. The officer’s Global Case Management System (GCMS) notes recorded several concerns that are common in temporary resident visa refusals:
- the purpose of the visit,
- the applicant’s financial circumstances,
- the source and availability of funds, and
- whether the applicant had significant family ties outside Canada.
Those concerns, on their own, are legitimate factors that visa officers routinely consider when assessing whether an applicant will leave Canada at the end of an authorized stay.
Under section 179 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, an officer must be satisfied that an applicant will leave Canada by the end of the period authorized for their stay before issuing a temporary resident visa.
The problem was not that the officer raised these concerns. The problem was that the record contained extensive evidence that directly contradicted each of them, and the officer’s reasons did not address that evidence.
The Financial Evidence the Officer Did Not Address
Kumar’s application included extensive financial documentation.
She submitted statements covering eleven bank accounts showing ongoing deposits totalling ₹5,534,658.16, which she estimated at more than CAD $90,000.
The funds were not unexplained lump-sum deposits. They were traceable to documented income sources.
Kumar had recently established a real estate business and submitted a registered business license, financial statements, and tax-related documentation in support of the application. She also submitted a lease agreement documenting rental income from the business.
On the Canadian side, Kumar’s sister in Montreal provided an invitation letter along with an undertaking to provide accommodation and other support during the visit.
To back that undertaking, the sister submitted evidence of her own income and financial position, including Canadian bank assets reportedly exceeding CAD $215,000.
None of this evidence was disputed. It was part of the record that was before the officer when the refusal was issued.
Yet the officer’s reasons raised concerns about the source, availability, and sufficiency of Kumar’s funds without explaining how those concerns survived in the face of this documentation.
Family Ties the Officer Did Not Adequately Consider
The officer’s notes also cited a lack of significant family ties outside Canada as a reason for refusing the application.
The record told a different story. Kumar submitted evidence showing that she lived with her elderly mother and brother in India.
She also provided documentation relating to her relationship with her mother and her responsibilities toward her, which suggested that Kumar had strong personal reasons to return home after a one-month family visit.
Combined with her newly established business, documented rental income, and ₹5.5 million across eleven accounts, this evidence directly contradicted the officer’s concern about insufficient family ties outside Canada when assessing a temporary visit to Canada.
The officer did not explain why those ties were considered insufficient.
Why the Federal Court Intervened
The Federal Court’s role in judicial review is not to decide whether Kumar deserved a visitor visa. The Court does not reweigh the evidence or substitute its own opinion for that of the visa officer.
What the Court does assess is whether the officer’s decision was reasonable.
Under the framework established by the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, a reasonable decision must be based on an internally coherent chain of reasoning that is justified in light of the legal and factual constraints on the decision-maker.
Justice Azmudeh found that the officer’s reasons fell short of that standard. The Court held that the officer’s failure to engage with the contradictory evidence in the record “created a logical vacuum which resulted in a breakdown in the chain of reasoning” (para. 15).
The Court described the resulting reasons as unintelligible, unjustified, and opaque, and therefore unreasonable (para. 16).
This does not mean that visa officers must write lengthy decisions for every application. The Court acknowledged that officers processing high volumes of temporary resident visa applications are not expected to produce detailed written reasons in every case.
However, when significant evidence in the record directly contradicts the stated grounds for refusal, the reasons must show that the officer actually considered that evidence.
An applicant and a reviewing court must be able to understand why the decision was reached, especially when important evidence appears to undermine the conclusion.
Listing standardized refusal concerns without connecting them to the actual file does not meet that requirement.
The Court Rejected Post-Hoc Rationalization
One notable aspect of the decision is the Court’s treatment of the respondent’s attempts to fill the gaps in the officer’s reasoning during the judicial review hearing.
Government counsel pointed to potential weaknesses in Kumar’s evidence that could, in theory, explain why the officer was not satisfied.
Justice Azmudeh rejected this approach. The Court stated that without any engagement or analysis by the officer in the actual decision, counsel’s submissions amounted to speculation about what factors may have been important to the officer (para. 15).
This is a recurring theme in Federal Court immigration decisions.
When an officer’s reasons do not explain why certain evidence was insufficient or unconvincing, a lawyer cannot fill that reasoning gap after the fact.
The reasonableness of a decision is assessed based on the reasons the decision-maker actually gave, not the reasons that might have existed.
What Happens After a Federal Court Sets Aside a Visa Refusal
The Court granted the application for judicial review, set aside the December 2024 refusal, and returned the file for redetermination by a different officer.
The Court declined to address the applicant’s procedural fairness arguments after finding the decision unreasonable on substantive grounds. No question was certified for appeal.
It is important to understand what this remedy means and what it does not mean.
The Federal Court did not order IRCC to issue a visitor visa to Kumar. A successful judicial review does not result in visa approval.
It means the original refusal has been removed, and the application goes back to IRCC to be decided again by a fresh decision-maker.
The new officer must assess the application according to law and provide a reasonable decision based on the record.
If the evidence genuinely supports a refusal, the officer can still refuse the application. The difference is that the new officer must explain why the evidence that contradicted the initial refusal is not sufficient, rather than simply ignoring it.
The new officer may approve or refuse the application after reassessing it. The Federal Court’s decision does not predetermine the outcome.
Does Having Strong Finances Guarantee a Canadian Visitor Visa
No, this is one of the most common misconceptions about the Canadian temporary resident visa process.
Financial evidence is one of several factors that visa officers consider when assessing a temporary resident visa application and makes your case strong.
But officers also look at the purpose of the trip, travel history, ties to the home country, the applicant’s immigration history, and any other relevant circumstances.
An applicant with CAD $90,000 in documented funds can still be refused if the officer has legitimate, explained concerns about other aspects of the application.
What an officer cannot do, as Kumar confirms, is cite financial concerns while ignoring extensive financial evidence that directly addresses those concerns.
The legal significance of this case is not that strong finances guarantee approval. It is that when an officer raises a concern that the record contradicts, the officer must grapple with that contradiction.
A decision that ignores the contradiction is not a reasonable one.
How Much Explanation Does a Visa Officer Have to Provide?
Visa officers deciding temporary resident visa applications are not expected to produce detailed written reasons comparable to those of a tribunal or a court.
The Federal Court has consistently recognized that officers at visa posts process large volumes of applications and that their reasons will necessarily be brief.
However, brief reasons are not the same as no reasons. Even in a high-volume environment, the officer’s notes must allow the applicant and a reviewing court to understand why the application was refused in light of the evidence that was submitted.
When an applicant submits evidence of eleven bank accounts, a registered business, documented rental income, and financial support from a Canadian host with over CAD $215,000 in assets, and the officer’s notes simply say the funds are insufficient without further explanation, there is a gap in the reasoning that cannot be bridged.
That gap is what Justice Azmudeh described as a “logical vacuum.” It is not a demand for perfection. It is a basic requirement that reasons connect to the record.
What Applicants Can Learn From This Case
While each temporary resident visa application is assessed on its own facts, the Kumar decision highlights several practical points that applicants and their representatives should keep in mind.
First, the strength of the evidentiary record matters. Kumar’s application included detailed, sourced financial evidence that left very little room for the officer to question her financial position.
Applicants should ensure that bank statements, income documentation, and proof of ties to their home country are comprehensive and clearly presented.
Second, host-side financial evidence is valuable. Kumar’s sister submitted proof of more than CAD $215,000 in Canadian bank assets along with her invitation and undertaking.
That evidence was directly relevant to whether the applicant’s funds were sufficient for the proposed travel, and the officer’s silence on it contributed to the unreasonableness finding.
Third, a temporary resident visa refusal is not necessarily the final word.
Applicants who receive a refusal that does not engage with the evidence they submitted have options, including requesting the officer’s GCMS notes, filing a request for reconsideration with the visa office, or applying for leave and judicial review in the Federal Court of Canada.
Under section 72 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the normal deadline to file an application for leave and judicial review is 60 days when the matter arises outside Canada and 15 days when it arises inside Canada.
A Federal Court judge may allow an extension for special reasons under section 72(2)(c), but applicants should not assume an extension will be granted.
Fourth, reapplying without addressing the refusal is rarely the most effective path forward.
A new application that does not explain why the earlier refusal was wrong risks producing the same result, and it adds a second refusal to the applicant’s immigration history.
Case Details at a Glance
Case Citation Kumar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1138 Court Federal Court of Canada Decision Date September 10, 2026 Judge Justice Azmudeh Docket IMM-289-25 Applicant Seema Kumar, citizen of India Application Type Temporary Resident Visa (Visitor Visa) Date of Refusal December 19, 2024 Outcome Judicial review granted; refusal set aside; redetermination by a different officer Question Certified No This case comes at a time of high temporary resident visa refusal rates in Canada.
IRCC reports that the global TRV refusal rate reached 54% in 2024, compared with 39% in 2023. Approximately 1.95 million visitor visa applications were refused in 2024 alone.
Separately, the federal government has introduced measures to reduce temporary resident volumes, particularly among international students and temporary workers, as it works toward reducing the non-permanent resident share of Canada’s population.
Those temporary resident arrival targets do not include visitors arriving on temporary resident visas.
Regardless of the broader policy direction, the legal requirement remains that each individual application be assessed on its own merits with reasons that are justified, transparent, and intelligible.
The Kumar decision is a reminder that high-volume processing environments do not excuse decision-making that ignores the applicant’s actual evidence.
Officers who rely on standardized refusal language without connecting it to the specific file risk producing decisions that cannot withstand judicial scrutiny.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Can IRCC still refuse Seema Kumar’s visitor visa after the Federal Court overturned the original refusal?
Yes, the Federal Court’s decision returned the application to IRCC for a new decision by a different officer. That officer must assess the application according to law and provide a reasonable decision based on the record. If the evidence supports a refusal for clearly explained reasons, the officer can still refuse the application. The difference is that the new officer must engage with the evidence rather than repeat the same boilerplate concerns that led to the original refusal being set aside.
How long do I have to challenge a Canadian visitor visa refusal in Federal Court?
Under section 72(2)(b) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the normal deadline to file an application for leave and judicial review is 60 days from the date the decision was communicated when the decision was made outside Canada. For decisions made inside Canada, the deadline is 15 days. A Federal Court judge may allow an extension for special reasons under section 72(2)(c), but applicants should not assume an extension will be granted and should treat these deadlines as firm.
Does having CAD $90,000 or more in the bank guarantee approval of a Canadian visitor visa?
No, financial evidence is one of several factors that visa officers assess. Officers also consider the purpose of the visit, travel history, ties to the applicant’s home country, and other circumstances. What the Kumar decision establishes is that when an applicant submits substantial financial evidence, the officer cannot cite financial concerns in the refusal without explaining why that evidence was insufficient or unconvincing.
What is the difference between a judicial review and an appeal in Canadian immigration law?
A judicial review is not an appeal. On judicial review, the Federal Court does not substitute its own decision for that of the officer. Instead, the Court assesses whether the officer’s decision was reasonable, meaning whether it was based on a coherent chain of reasoning that engaged with the evidence and the applicable law. If the decision is found unreasonable, the Court sets it aside and sends the file back to IRCC for a new decision. The Court does not approve or refuse the visa application itself.
What should I do if my Canadian visitor visa was refused and the officer did not address the evidence I submitted?
Start by carefully reviewing the officer decision note provided with your refusal letter. IRCC now provides these notes with most temporary resident visa refusal letters, giving applicants more information about why the application was refused. If additional records are needed, applicants may also request their immigration file through an access-to-information request. If the reasons do not meaningfully engage with important evidence submitted in the application, there may be grounds to consider judicial review. Given the strict filing timelines, applicants considering a court challenge should seek qualified advice promptly.
Fact-Checked: This article has been reviewed for factual accuracy against the Federal Court judgment in Kumar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1138, official IRCC guidance, and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and Regulations. All case details, paragraph references, and legal outcomes have been verified.
Disclaimer: This article is published for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Immigration News Canada is not a law firm and does not provide individualized legal or immigration advice. Readers should consult a qualified immigration lawyer or a Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant (RCIC) for advice specific to their circumstances.
Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.
You may also like: New OAS Payments Coming On September 25, 2026
New Minimum Wage In Canada’s 5 Provinces Effective October 1
New OAS Payment Increase Coming In October 2026
New Canada Benefit Payments Still Coming In September 2026
- New Ontario Rent Rules Effective September 21
5 days from now, Ontario tenants and landlords will operate under a fundamentally different set of rental rules.
The second wave of amendments under Bill 60 and Bill 97 takes effect on September 21, 2026, introducing shorter eviction timelines, a codified definition of habitually late rent, financial prerequisites for raising certain issues at hearings, and revised compensation rules for personal-use evictions across the province.
These changes follow the first round of Ontario law changes that landed on July 1, which halved the LTB order review window and doubled maximum fines for offences under the Residential Tenancies Act.
Together, the two waves represent a significant package of changes to Ontario eviction procedures.
Ontario’s Orders in Council and implementing regulations confirm September 21, 2026, as the effective date for this package of Residential Tenancies Act changes.
Tribunals Ontario had previously announced in its June 30 operational update that additional Bill 60 and Bill 97 changes would take effect in September, and 10 additional Ontario rules arriving this month compound the scale of changes Ontario residents are navigating.
Here are the major September 21 changes affecting Ontario landlords and tenants and what they mean in practice.
Table of Contents
Ontario Cuts the N4 Notice Period
Ontario is reducing the minimum notice period on an N4 non-payment notice for most tenancies.
Landlords who serve an N4 notice on or after September 21 must provide only 7 days of notice before becoming eligible to file an L1 eviction application at the Landlord and Tenant Board, regardless of the tenancy type.
Until September 20, the minimum N4 termination period is already seven days for daily or weekly tenancies and fourteen days for other tenancies, including typical monthly tenancies.
Starting September 21, the minimum becomes seven days for every tenancy.
Consider a tenant with a monthly tenancy who misses rent on October 1 and receives an N4 notice on October 2.
Under the old timeline for monthly tenancies, the termination date would fall on October 16, and the landlord could file at the LTB on October 17 at the earliest.
Under the new rule, the termination date lands on October 9, and the landlord can file on October 10.
That is a full week removed from the front end of the eviction process before any hearing backlog factors in. The ability to resolve the matter through payment is still intact.
Paying all arrears and any newly due rent before the termination date voids the N4 notice entirely, and section 74 of the Residential Tenancies Act still allows tenants to stop the process through full payment even after an L1 is filed.
The critical difference is how quickly the filing threshold arrives for monthly and yearly tenancies.
An N4 served before September 21 must comply with the notice period that applied when it was served.
A seven-day notice served before September 21 would therefore be defective for a typical monthly or yearly tenancy, but not for a daily or weekly tenancy.
3 Payments More Than 7 Days Late Can Establish Persistent Late Payment
Ontario has never had a statutory definition of persistent late payment of rent until now.
O. Reg. 241/26 introduces section 8.1 to Ontario Regulation 516/06, establishing a concrete benchmark that the LTB must apply.
Persistent late payment now includes circumstances where a tenant has failed to pay rent within 7 days of the due date on at least 3 separate occasions within any rolling 6-month period.
This is a separate eviction ground from non-payment, served through an N8 notice under subsection 58(1) of the Act.
Meeting this benchmark does not automatically trigger an eviction, but it provides a ground upon which a landlord can pursue an N8 proceeding at the LTB.
Before this regulation, adjudicators exercised broad discretion over what qualified as persistent lateness, and rulings varied significantly between individual hearings.
The new regulation establishes a prescribed benchmark that qualifies as persistent late payment while expressly preserving the LTB’s ability to find persistent late payment in other circumstances.
One carve-out applies: a late payment does not count toward the threshold if it occurred solely because the landlord applied a rent payment to another amount owed by the tenant.
A Financial Prerequisite for Raising Section 82 Issues at Non-Payment Hearings
For non-payment applications filed on or after September 21, tenants who want to raise their own section 82 issues within the landlord’s proceeding must pay half of the rent arrears claimed when the application was filed.
O. Reg. 241/26 requires that this payment be completed no later than 7 days before the scheduled hearing date.
The requirement does not prevent a tenant from defending the landlord’s arrears claim itself.
It applies to additional issues the tenant seeks to raise under section 82, such as maintenance failures, harassment, or illegal entries, within that non-payment proceeding.
Applications filed before September 21 remain subject to the previous section 82 rules even if the hearing takes place after that date.
Tenants retain full access to separate T2 and T6 applications for maintenance and other issues outside the non-payment proceeding itself.
Advocacy organizations have warned that the prepayment requirement disproportionately affects lower-income tenants.
Landlords Choose Between Speed and Cost on Personal-Use Evictions
The N12 personal-use eviction framework gains a second pathway on September 21.
Under the existing rule, a landlord serving an N12 under section 48 must provide at least 60 days of notice and pay the tenant one month’s rent as compensation before the termination date.
The new option allows landlords who provide at least 120 days of notice to skip the compensation payment entirely.
To qualify for the compensation waiver, the N12 must be given on or after September 21, the termination date must be at least 120 days later, and that termination date must fall at the end of a rental period or at the end of a fixed term.
A Toronto landlord collecting $3,400 per month saves that full amount by choosing the 120-day route.
A landlord in Hamilton or Kitchener collecting $1,800 per month saves $1,800 under the same calculation.
The tradeoff is a termination date at least 60 days later than the standard minimum N12 notice period.
This waiver applies exclusively to landlord-own-use evictions under section 48 of the Residential Tenancies Act.
Purchaser-use N12 notices under section 49 remain subject to the existing one-month compensation requirement in section 49.1.
The good-faith requirement under section 48 remains fully operative, and the intended occupant must genuinely plan to reside in the unit as their primary home for at least 12 months.
A Strict Clock Creates a Bad-Faith Presumption on N12 Evictions
O. Reg. 240/26 introduces a measurable standard for evaluating whether a personal-use eviction was carried out honestly.
Effective September 21, failure by the person named in a landlord-own-use N12 to occupy the unit within the prescribed 60-day period creates a rebuttable presumption that the notice was given in bad faith.
The landlord can still rebut that presumption on a balance of probabilities.
The 60-day clock starts from the termination date on the N12 if the tenant leaves on or before that date.
If the tenant vacates after the termination date, the clock starts from the actual move-out date instead.
A landlord who triggers the bad-faith presumption bears the burden of proving the eviction was legitimate.
General compensation for a tenant who prevails in a bad-faith case can reach up to 12 months of the former tenant’s last monthly rent.
The LTB can also impose an administrative fine of up to $50,000 in bad-faith eviction cases, and these board fines are separate from the court-level maximums of $100,000 for individuals and $500,000 for corporations.
Repairs and Renovations Gain New Notification and Return Requirements
Tenants displaced for repairs or renovations who preserve their right of first refusal gain new protections starting September 21.
Where a tenant gives the landlord written notice that they want to exercise the right of first refusal, the landlord must provide written notice of the estimated completion date, any change to that estimate, and when the unit is actually ready for occupancy.
The new notification duties apply where the tenant’s right-of-first-refusal notice is given on or after September 21.
Separately, where a qualifying unit becomes ready for occupancy on or after September 21, the tenant must be given at least 60 days to exercise the right of first refusal.
If the landlord fails to meet any of these notification requirements or does not provide the full 60-day re-occupancy window, the tenant can file an application at the LTB based on a failure to afford the right of first refusal.
These provincial rules build on municipal-level protections, including the Toronto Rental Renovation Licence requirement that launched in July 2025.
N13 notices carry their own compensation obligations under sections 52, 54, and 55 of the Act, and those obligations remain unchanged by the September 21 amendments.
Core Tenant Protections That Remain Unchanged
Security of tenure remains the backbone of Ontario rental law.
A landlord still cannot evict a tenant without both a valid legal ground and a formal order from the Landlord and Tenant Board.
An eviction notice on its own does not authorize a landlord to physically remove a tenant.
Where an eviction order is required, it must come through the LTB process and can only be legally enforced through the prescribed enforcement process.
Fixed-term leases continue to convert automatically to month-to-month arrangements when they expire.
The 2026 rent increase guideline of 2.1% remains the ceiling for rent-controlled units, and landlords cannot exceed this cap without LTB approval for an above-guideline increase.
Qualifying units first occupied for residential purposes after November 15, 2018, remain exempt from the rent increase guideline.
However, landlords of post-2018 units must still comply with the general 12-month timing rule and provide at least 90 days’ notice in the proper form before a rent increase takes effect.
The right to a safe and properly maintained unit, uninterrupted essential services, and the requirement for 24-hour written notice for landlord entry where notice is required all carry forward untouched.
Practical Steps for Tenants Before September 21
Clear any outstanding rent arrears before September 21 to avoid exposure to the accelerated 7-day N4 timeline on monthly and yearly tenancies.
Set up automatic rent payments through your bank to eliminate the risk of accidental late payment under the new persistent-late-payment threshold.
Request a rent ledger from your landlord to confirm that no payments have been recorded late due to processing delays or misapplied funds.
If you receive an N12 personal-use eviction notice, verify immediately whether the landlord has either paid one month of rent as compensation or met all three conditions for the new 120-day waiver.
Document every communication with your landlord in writing from this point forward, including renovation timelines, completion estimates, and re-occupancy dates.
Confirm that your 2025 income tax return is filed and assessed to avoid gaps in benefit payments that could push rent past the 7-day late threshold.
Practical Steps for Landlords Before September 21
Update every N4 notice template to reflect the universal 7-day termination period for notices served on or after September 21.
Audit your rent collection records for the past 6 months to identify tenants who may already meet the three-strike persistent-late-payment benchmark.
Evaluate whether the 60-day notice path with compensation or the 120-day no-compensation path is more strategic for any planned N12 evictions, keeping in mind all three statutory conditions for the waiver.
Establish a documented notification protocol for renovation projects that meets the new written-update requirements tied to the right of first refusal.
Ensure that every intended N12 occupant can move into the unit within 60 days to avoid triggering the new bad-faith presumption.
Verify that your property management systems and filing calendars are updated before the effective date, and review the Ontario minimum wage increase arriving in October for any impact on building maintenance staffing costs.
Summary of Ontario Rent Changes Effective September 21, 2026
Change Details N4 Notice Period Universal 7-day minimum for all tenancy types (previously 7 days for daily/weekly, 14 days for monthly/yearly) Persistent Late Payment Paying more than 7 days late on 3 or more occasions in 6 months establishes the prescribed benchmark for persistent late payment (N8 ground). 50% Arrears Prepayment For applications filed on or after September 21, tenants must pay half of L1-claimed arrears at least 7 days before a hearing to raise section 82 issues. N12 Compensation Waiver Compensation is waived when all three conditions are met: N12 is given on or after September 21, the termination date is at least 120 days later, and the termination date is at the end of the rental period or fixed term; purchaser-use evictions under section 49 still require compensation. 60-Day Occupancy Presumption If the named N12 occupant does not move in within 60 days, a rebuttable presumption of bad faith applies Right of First Refusal (Repairs/Renovations) Written updates are required at every stage for tenants who preserve their right of first refusal; a 60-day re-occupancy window once the unit is ready. Key Dates in the 2026 Ontario Rental Law Overhaul
Date What Happened or Happens November 27, 2025 Bill 60 (Fighting Delays, Building Faster Act, 2025) received Royal Assent. July 1, 2026 Wave 1: 15-day LTB review window, doubled RTA offence fines, tenant AC installation right, mandatory Payment Agreement Form under section 206 September 21, 2026 Wave 2: Universal 7-day N4, persistent late payment benchmark, 50% arrears prerequisite for section 82 issues, N12 compensation waiver, 60-day occupancy presumption, right-of-first-refusal notification rules Residents should also confirm whether any statutory holidays fall within their 7-day N4 window, since payment processing timelines at banks may affect when a rent payment clears.
September 21 brings several substantive changes to Ontario eviction rules, and the federal law changes taking effect this month are adding to the volume of regulatory updates Canadians are absorbing this fall.
Ontario residents who also track broader provincial changes can review the new Ontario car insurance rate cuts and Ontario driving rules that changed earlier this year to stay current on the full scope of regulatory shifts across the province.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Can a landlord file for eviction the same day the 7-day N4 notice expires?
The landlord becomes eligible to file an L1 application on the day after the termination date, not on the termination date itself.
If the N4 is served on October 2 with a 7-day termination period, the termination date is October 9, and the earliest possible L1 filing date is October 10.
However, paying all outstanding rent and any newly due rent before the landlord files the L1 voids the notice entirely, regardless of whether the termination date has passed.Do the three late payments under the persistent-late-payment rule need to be consecutive months?
The three late payments do not need to occur in consecutive months.
O. Reg. 241/26 defines the threshold as at least 3 occasions of paying more than 7 days late within any rolling 6-month period, and the late payments can be scattered across different months within that window.
A tenant who pays late in January, March, and May within the same year would meet the threshold if all three were more than 7 days past due.What happens if a tenant cannot afford the 50% arrears prepayment before a hearing?
For non-payment applications filed on or after September 21, a tenant who does not pay 50% of the L1-claimed arrears at least 7 days before the hearing loses the ability to raise section 82 issues within that specific proceeding.
The tenant can still defend against the landlord’s arrears claim and can file separate T2 or T6 applications to address maintenance or other issues through an independent process at the LTB.
Applications filed before September 21 continue under the previous section 82 rules, even if the hearing itself is scheduled after September 21.Does the 120-day N12 compensation waiver apply when a purchaser wants to move into a unit they just bought?
The 120-day no-compensation option applies only to landlord-own-use evictions under section 48 of the Residential Tenancies Act.
Purchaser-use N12 notices under section 49 are governed by a separate compensation provision in section 49.1 and remain subject to the one-month rent compensation requirement regardless of how much notice the purchaser provides.How can a tenant prove that the person named in an N12 did not move in within 60 days?
The tenant would file a T5 application at the LTB, and evidence such as utility records, mail forwarding status, neighbour statements, and any listing of the unit on rental platforms after the tenant vacated can all support the claim.
Once the 60-day deadline passes without the named occupant moving in, O. Reg. 240/26 triggers a rebuttable presumption of bad faith, which shifts the burden of proof to the landlord to demonstrate the eviction was genuine.
Compensation for a successful bad-faith claim can reach up to 12 months of the former tenant’s last monthly rent, plus the LTB can impose an administrative fine of up to $50,000.Fact Check: All information in this article has been verified against the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006; Bill 60 (Fighting Delays, Building Faster Act, 2025); Bill 97 (Helping Homebuyers, Protecting Tenants Act, 2023); O. Reg. 240/26; O. Reg. 241/26; the relevant Orders in Council; and the Tribunals Ontario operational update of June 30, 2026.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a licensed paralegal or lawyer for guidance specific to your situation.
Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.
You may also like: New OAS Payments Coming On September 25, 2026
New Minimum Wage In Canada’s 5 Provinces Effective October 1
New OAS Payment Increase Coming In October 2026
New Canada Benefit Payments Still Coming In September 2026
- Deportations From Canada Surge For Indian Nationals In 2026
Canada has already enforced more than 12,000 immigration removals in the first seven months of 2026, and one nationality stands dramatically ahead of all others on the latest Canada Border Services Agency enforcement list.
A total of 3,717 Indian nationals were removed from Canada between January 1 and July 31, 2026, according to CBSA’s most recently published data.
That figure represents approximately 29.8% of all enforced removals recorded during that period, meaning nearly three in every ten people removed from Canada so far this year held Indian citizenship.
India also leads CBSA’s much larger removal-in-progress inventory, with 8,817 Indian nationals currently listed among cases actively moving through the enforcement pipeline.
The 12,491 enforced removals recorded through July 31, 2026, therefore include a mix of deportation orders, exclusion orders, and departure orders.
Table of Contents
CBSA’s Latest Extortion Crackdown Leads To 111 Removals
Alongside its broader removal operations, CBSA announced on September 14, 2026, that its targeted enforcement initiative against extortion networks had resulted in 111 removals from Canada.
As of September 3, 2026, the agency reported that 188 removal orders had been issued on various inadmissibility grounds as part of this initiative, with 111 of those individuals already removed.
The regional breakdown of the extortion-linked enforcement activity is as follows.
Region Removal Orders Issued Individuals Removed Pacific Region 91 58 Prairie Region 47 30 Greater Toronto Area 50 23 Total 188 111 Source: Canada Border Services Agency, as of September 3, 2026. CBSA began formally tracking immigration enforcement cases with potential links to extortion in the Pacific and Prairie regions in August 2025, later extending the initiative to the Greater Toronto Area in November 2025.
The agency highlighted four recent individuals linked to extortion or organized criminal schemes who were removed from Canada.
Palwinder Singh was removed after the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada found him inadmissible for being a member of a criminal organization linked to extortion-related violence, including an extortion-related shooting in the fall of 2025.
Jasmer Singh, who had been convicted in Canada of forcible confinement, was found inadmissible for serious criminality and was issued a deportation order before being removed.
Amitoz Bajwa was removed after the IRB found him inadmissible for being a member of an organization engaged in a pattern of criminal activity, with links to firearms-related activity and an extortion-related shooting.
Sahibjot Singh was found inadmissible by the IRB for links to an organization engaged in a pattern of criminal activity and acknowledged committing offences forming part of that organization’s criminal pattern before being removed.
It is important to note that the 111 extortion-linked removals represent a separate targeted initiative and should not be merged with the nationality-level statistics presented earlier.
CBSA’s release does not identify the citizenship of the 111 removed individuals, and the agency has emphasized that these cases involve investigations into potential links to extortion and can involve different inadmissibility grounds.
Indians Top Canada’s Latest Removal List
India’s position at the top of CBSA’s 2026 removal list is not merely a matter of leading by a narrow margin.
The gap between India and the second-ranked nationality, Mexico, is substantial.
Mexico recorded 1,936 enforced removals through July 31, meaning India’s total is nearly double that of the next closest country.
This represents a significant shift from recent years, when Mexico consistently led CBSA’s nationality rankings.
Top 10 Nationalities Removed From Canada In 2026
The following table shows the top 10 citizenship groups in CBSA’s enforced removal statistics through July 31, 2026.
Citizenship Enforced Removals (Jan–Jul 2026) India 3,717 Mexico 1,936 United States 510 Colombia 473 Haiti 414 Romania 356 Bangladesh 269 Nigeria 260 Turkey 253 China 230 Remaining nationalities 4,073 Total 12,491 Source: Canada Border Services Agency, Immigration removal statistics, data through July 31, 2026. Several features of this table are worth noting.
The United States ranks third with 510 removals, reflecting the fact that enforcement applies to nationals from all countries, including Canada’s closest ally and neighbour.
Colombia, Haiti, and Romania round out the middle of the list, while Bangladesh, Nigeria, Turkey, and China each recorded between 230 and 269 removals.
The remaining nationalities not individually listed account for 4,073 removals combined, illustrating that CBSA’s enforcement mandate reaches a wide range of citizenship groups.
India Also Tops Canada’s Removal-In-Progress List
Beyond the 12,491 removals that have already been enforced, CBSA maintains a separate inventory of cases still working through the enforcement pipeline.
As of July 31, 2026, this removal-in-progress inventory contained 44,781 individuals.
India leads this inventory as well, with 8,817 Indian nationals currently listed.
Citizenship Removal-In-Progress Inventory India 8,817 Mexico 6,239 Nigeria 2,264 China 1,867 United States 1,641 Colombia 1,372 Pakistan 1,291 Bangladesh 1,190 Ghana 1,083 Remaining nationalities 17,698 Total 44,781 Source: Canada Border Services Agency, inventory as of July 31, 2026. *Note: CBSA’s published citizenship rows do not add up to its stated removal-in-progress total of 44,781. The displayed rows are short by 1,319 cases, but CBSA’s published table does not identify those 1,319 cases as Haiti. Immigration News Canada has therefore reproduced only the citizenship figures explicitly published by CBSA.
The removal-in-progress inventory includes individuals who can currently be processed for removal but whose cases may face practical barriers, including the issuance of travel documents by foreign governments.
CBSA also maintains separate inventories for individuals who are not yet actionable (452,178 cases), those whose removal is not currently possible (36,027 cases), and wanted individuals whom CBSA is working to locate (34,039 cases).
The combined total across all four inventories stood at 567,025 as of July 31, 2026.
How 2026 Indian Removal Numbers Compare With 2025
The 2026 data becomes even more striking when placed alongside the full-year 2025 figures.
During the entire 2025 calendar year, Canada removed 3,779 Indian nationals.
By July 31, 2026, with five full months still remaining in the year, Canada had already removed 3,717 Indian nationals.
That means the first seven months of 2026 had reached approximately 98.4% of the total number of Indian nationals removed during the entire previous year.
At the current pace, the 2026 full-year total for Indian nationals is on track to significantly exceed the 2025 total.
The shift is also visible in the nationality rankings.
In 2025, Mexico led the removal list with 4,837 removals and India ranked second with 3,779.
In the latest 2026 data, India has overtaken Mexico to occupy the number-one position, while Mexico’s 2026 total through July (1,936) is running well below its 2025 pace.
Citizenship Full Year 2025 Jan–Jul 2026 India 3,779 3,717 Mexico 4,837 1,936 Haiti 2,275 414 Colombia 892 473 Romania 828 356 United States 803 510 Source: Canada Border Services Agency. How Many People Has Canada Removed Each Month In 2026?
CBSA publishes monthly removal figures that reveal significant variation across the first seven months of the year.
Month Enforced Removals January 2,652 February 1,267 March 1,423 April 1,787 May 2,217 June 1,599 July 1,546 Total (Jan–Jul) 12,491 Source: Canada Border Services Agency, data through July 31, 2026. January recorded the highest monthly total at 2,652 enforced removals, followed by May at 2,217. February was the lowest month at 1,267 removals.
The data does not show a consistent month-over-month increase or decrease, and CBSA has previously noted that removal volumes can fluctuate due to factors including court proceedings, travel document availability, and international cooperation timelines.
Canada Recorded A Historic Removal High In 2025
The 2025 calendar year marked a record for CBSA enforcement.
The agency carried out 23,160 enforced removals during the year, which Public Safety Canada and CBSA have described as the highest number of inadmissible persons removed in the history of the agency.
The following table places 2026’s partial-year total in historical context.
Year Total Enforced Removals 2020 12,858 2021 7,523 2022 8,335 2023 15,231 2024 17,397 2025 23,160 2026 (through July 31) 12,491 Source: Canada Border Services Agency. The 2021 figure of 7,523 was depressed by travel restrictions and operational limitations during the pandemic.
Removals increased sharply from 2022 through 2025, rising from 8,335 to 23,160, with 2025 reaching the highest annual removal total recorded in CBSA history.
The 2026 figure of 12,491 through seven months should not be directly compared against the full-year totals above without noting that five months of data remain outstanding.
It would be premature to claim that 2026 will surpass the 2025 record based on the available partial-year data alone.
What the data does show clearly is that the 2026 surge in Indian national removals is one of the most distinctive enforcement trends visible in this year’s CBSA statistics.
Why Are People Being Removed From Canada?
Understanding why individuals are removed from Canada requires looking at CBSA’s inadmissibility data, which breaks down enforced removals by the legal grounds under Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
Inadmissibility Ground Removals (Jan–Jul 2026) Non-compliance (s. 41) – refugee claimants 10,050 Non-compliance (s. 41) – non-claimants 1,544 Criminality (s. 36) 746 Other inadmissibility grounds 84 Misrepresentation (s. 40) 67 Total 12,491 Source: Canada Border Services Agency, data through July 31, 2026. The most significant takeaway from this table is that 10,050 of the 12,491 enforced removals, or approximately 80.4%, involved non-compliance by refugee claimants.
This category includes refugee claimants whose claims were not approved and individuals who did not pursue their claims or comply with requirements under the refugee determination process.
An additional 1,544 removals involved non-compliance by individuals who were not refugee claimants, such as people who overstayed visas or violated the conditions of work or study permits.
Criminality under section 36 of IRPA accounted for 746 removals, representing approximately 6% of the total.
The “other” category of 84 removals covers inadmissibility on grounds including security concerns under section 34, human or international rights violations under section 35, organized crime under section 37, health grounds under section 38, financial inadmissibility under section 39, cessation under section 40.1, and inadmissible family members under section 42.
Misrepresentation, which includes making false statements or withholding material information in immigration applications, accounted for 67 removals.
This breakdown is critical because it demonstrates that the overwhelming majority of enforced removals in 2026 are not criminal deportations.
CBSA does not publish a nationality-by-inadmissibility cross-tabulation in this dataset, which means the fact that Indian nationals lead the overall removal list does not, on its own, tell us how many Indian nationals were removed for criminality versus non-compliance or other grounds.
Deportation vs Removal: What Is The Difference?
Canadian immigration law draws an important distinction between the general concept of removal and the specific legal category of a deportation order.
When public discussion and news headlines refer to “deportation,” they are typically using the term as a broad shorthand for any removal from Canada.
However, CBSA tracks three separate types of removal orders, and the consequences of each one differ significantly.
Through July 31, 2026, CBSA recorded the following removal-order breakdown.
Removal Order Type Number (Jan–Jul 2026) Deportation order 7,333 Departure order 2,618 Exclusion order 2,540 Total 12,491 Source: Canada Border Services Agency, data through July 31, 2026. Deportation orders accounted for 7,333 of the 12,491 enforced removals, or approximately 58.7% of the total.
The remaining 41.3% were departure orders and exclusion orders, which carry different re-entry rules.
Three Types Of Canada Removal Orders Explained
Each removal order type under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act carries specific consequences for the individual’s ability to return to Canada.
Departure order: This order requires the individual to leave Canada within 30 days after it becomes enforceable and to confirm their departure with CBSA by obtaining a certificate of departure.
If the individual does not leave within 30 days, the departure order automatically becomes a deportation order.
Exclusion order: This order requires the individual to leave Canada and generally bars them from returning for one year.
If the exclusion order was issued on grounds of misrepresentation under section 40 of IRPA, the bar extends to five years.
In either case, the individual may apply for an Authorization to Return to Canada where applicable.
Deportation order: This is the most serious type of removal order.
It requires the individual to leave Canada and permanently bars them from returning unless they obtain written Authorization to Return to Canada from IRCC.
How Removals Are Carried Out
Not every enforced removal involves CBSA officers physically escorting someone onto a flight.
According to CBSA’s 2026 data through July 31, approximately 66% of removals were confirmed departures from Canada, meaning CBSA verified that the individual left the country and issued a certificate of departure.
Approximately 34% were administrative removals, a category CBSA uses for cases where sufficient evidence establishes that an individual who did not formally confirm their departure is no longer in Canada and the removal order can be administratively enforced.
Less than 1% fell into other verification methods.
What The Latest CBSA Numbers Mean For The Rest Of 2026
Canada’s immigration enforcement apparatus is operating at an elevated tempo heading into the final months of 2026.
CBSA has stated it is removing approximately 400 people per week, the removal-in-progress inventory contains nearly 45,000 individuals, and the government has committed significant new funding and staffing to enforcement.
Bill C-12, which received Royal Assent in March 2026, introduced new asylum-claim eligibility rules and changes intended to make asylum processing more efficient, including provisions that can make removal orders effective sooner in certain circumstances.
The targeted extortion crackdown is continuing, with CBSA signalling that further investigations and removals will follow as cases progress.
For Indian nationals specifically, the data suggests that the full-year 2026 removal total is very likely to exceed the 2025 figure of 3,779.
The broader removal-in-progress inventory of 8,817 Indian nationals indicates that enforcement activity involving Indian citizens will remain a prominent feature of CBSA operations well beyond September.
Whether the overall 2026 annual removal total will match or exceed the record 23,160 set in 2025 will depend on CBSA’s operational capacity, legal proceedings, the availability of travel documents from foreign governments, and the pace at which cases clear the remaining enforcement stages.
What is clear from the latest data is that Canada’s immigration enforcement system is operating at historically elevated levels, Indian nationals now occupy the most prominent position in the country’s removal statistics, and the federal government has signalled no indication that this enforcement posture will soften before the year ends.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
How many people has Canada deported in 2026?
Canada enforced 12,491 immigration removals between January 1 and July 31, 2026, according to the latest CBSA data. These enforced removals include three types of removal orders under Canadian immigration law: deportation orders (7,333), departure orders (2,618), and exclusion orders (2,540). The term “deported” in popular usage refers broadly to all removals from Canada, but only deportation orders, which accounted for approximately 58.7% of the total, are technically classified as deportations under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. CBSA has stated it is currently removing approximately 400 inadmissible individuals per week, and additional removals will continue to be recorded through the remainder of the year.
Which nationality has the most deportations from Canada in 2026?
India leads CBSA’s 2026 removal list with 3,717 enforced removals recorded through July 31, representing approximately 29.8% of all removals during that period. Mexico ranks second with 1,936, followed by the United States (510), Colombia (473), and Haiti (414). India also leads CBSA’s removal-in-progress inventory with 8,817 cases as of July 31, 2026. This marks a shift from 2025, when Mexico led the annual removal list with 4,837 and India ranked second with 3,779. CBSA does not break down nationality data by removal-order type or by inadmissibility ground, so the 3,717 figure includes Indian nationals removed under all three types of removal orders and across all inadmissibility categories.
Why is Canada removing so many Indian nationals in 2026?
CBSA’s published data does not offer a specific explanation for why India leads the 2026 removal list, and the agency does not publish a cross-tabulation of nationality by inadmissibility ground.
What the broader inadmissibility data shows is that 80.4% of all 2026 enforced removals involved non-compliance by refugee claimants. This category includes claimants whose claims were not approved as well as individuals who did not pursue their claims or comply with requirements under the refugee determination process.
An additional 12.4% involved non-compliance by non-claimants, such as visa overstayers or work and study permit violators, while 6% involved criminality. The overall data suggests that the majority of removals across all nationalities are connected to the refugee determination system rather than to criminal inadmissibility.Can someone return to Canada after being deported?
The answer depends on which type of removal order was issued. A departure order allows the individual to leave Canada voluntarily within 30 days and, once confirmed, does not bar future applications to return. An exclusion order bars the individual from returning for one year, or five years if it was issued on misrepresentation grounds, unless they obtain an Authorization to Return to Canada. A deportation order permanently bars the individual from returning unless they obtain a written Authorization to Return to Canada from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada.
When assessing an Authorization to Return to Canada application, immigration officers consider factors including the reason for the original removal order, how much time has passed, the applicant’s current circumstances, the reason they want to return, and whether the circumstances that led to the removal have changed. Any underlying inadmissibility must also be resolved before an Authorization to Return to Canada can be issued.How many people are currently waiting to be removed from Canada?
As of July 31, 2026, CBSA’s removal-in-progress inventory contained 44,781 individuals who could currently be processed for removal. Beyond that, 452,178 individuals were in the not-yet-actionable inventory, which includes people with pending refugee applications or other unresolved proceedings. A further 36,027 were in the removal-not-possible category due to factors such as pending Federal Court appeals or criminal proceedings, and 34,039 were listed as wanted individuals whom CBSA is actively working to locate. The combined total across all four removal sub-inventories stood at 567,025. India leads the removal-in-progress inventory with 8,817 cases, followed by Mexico (6,239), Nigeria (2,264), and China (1,867).
Fact-Checked: The information presented in this article is based on official data published by the Canada Border Services Agency on its immigration removal statistics page, last modified September 11, 2026, and on CBSA news releases published on Canada.ca. All figures, percentages, and legal explanations have been independently verified against these primary sources.
Disclaimer: This article is published for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Individuals facing removal proceedings or immigration enforcement action should consult a qualified immigration lawyer or a Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant.
Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.
You may also like: New OAS Payments Coming On September 25, 2026
New Minimum Wage In Canada’s 5 Provinces Effective October 1
New OAS Payment Increase Coming In October 2026
New Canada Benefit Payments Still Coming In September 2026
